Viewing profile — matjet
matjet
HN member- Joined
- Thu, Oct 28, 2021, 5:24 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 52
- Public activity
- 22 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About matjet
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #47001608
At this time, the competition is soon finishing - with no models having succeeded. Given the incentives for top labs, and the short time needed for a successful automated solution,…
-
comment
Comment #47001509
Look what they need to mimic a fraction of [the power of having the logit probabilities exposed so you can actually see where the model is uncertain]
-
comment
Comment #38238956
From "Clickbait is bad, and I don't do it." to "I am working to efficiently clickbait people." Reminds me of: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S2xHZPH5Sng
-
comment
Comment #37839714
I think you misunderstand induced demand. The increased demand when you add more capacity, simply means even more utilisation is achieved -> increased productivity. This is not a w…
-
comment
Comment #36892179
Lore dump: This is not a coincidence, as the characters themselves refer to the chidori being named due to sounding like thousands of birds. The alternate name used by kakashi, rai…
-
comment
Comment #36888002
Is this a sarcastic joke, or is it a serious comment? I honestly cannot tell.
-
comment
Comment #35468587
The latter option is closest, but neither is quite right. It would have ~known~ that the problem asked, combined with a phrase for a 15 line limit has associations with a length of…
-
comment
Comment #35134163
Sharing of the model weights should now be fine. There is a 12 hour old post for the original pull request that was dismissed on the basis of being unlikely to be considered; that …
- story
-
comment
Comment #35119480
Gaussian blur is essentially acting as a low pass filter. An IR filter does not strictly destroy information in the filtered spectrum components, but does attenuate their power. Gi…
-
comment
Comment #35119239
Hear Hear! This deserves to be reiterated given the statements of information recoverability made in this thread.
-
comment
Comment #34892048
To someone only weakly aware in this area, can you explain what is wrong with the statement? From a cursory view, these protocols indeed seem to normally carry the mentioned payloa…
-
comment
Comment #34517888
While 1991 does seem too recent for the text, 1961 is not possible given it makes several references to later years, up to 1965/1968. I am curious if this article has been scanned …
-
comment
Comment #33572560
Can someone please elaborate on the relationship between archive links and spam? Why is this particular auto-flagging done?
-
comment
Comment #33462113
Patent trolls that are hated look like: You develop package to do X from first principles, then get sued because someone patented using a known algorithm for the purpose of X. Copy…
-
comment
Comment #32971278
Texas has the same pattern as Europe; higher percentages of solar and wind, resulting in an overdependence on gas.
-
comment
Comment #32920951
The correct analogy here would be implementing spam filtering by blocking large segments of email addresses. Eg, dropping mail from all non microsoft/gmail domains (as a nuisance r…
-
comment
Comment #31582214
To add a datapoint: In this video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T8q3zrCYMRw , they managed to differentiate most high end violins (4/5 tests - 10 Violins). Incidentally, the only…
-
comment
Comment #31456309
I do not see the use for this, over the standard access methods. people = { "Diane": 70, "Bob": 78, "Emma": 84 } people.get("Bob") # 78 The common usecase is: for key in people.key…
-
comment
Comment #29440856
Numerical simulations that I know of, all use steps or iterations of some type. Even if we start with theoretical infinite/perfect precision of the double pendulum, the numerical s…
-
comment
Comment #29401136
Multidimensional array construction is something I had looked forward to in Julia. I am not convinced that the approach taken in julia1.7 compares favorably with other language imp…
-
comment
Comment #29022730
I think you might want to reconsider your opinion of others. I believe the OP was referring to this result being on the edge of statistical significance given: The effect size rela…