Viewing profile — matheusd
matheusd
HN member- Joined
- Thu, Oct 16, 2014, 10:47 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 71
- Public activity
- 47 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About matheusd
https://matheusd.com
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #47487082
Unfortunately, it doesn't look like this is sufficient. While I had great success with GrapheneOS in the past, bank apps in Brazil have started blocking it, even when the profile y…
-
comment
Comment #46593075
How about this for an evaluation: Have this (trained-on-older-corpus) LLM propose experiments. We "play the role of nature" and inform it of the results of the experiments. It can …
-
comment
Comment #45493894
(Not op) Maybe not you in particular, but I expect people to be more forthcoming in their writing towards LLMs vs a raw google search. For example, a search of "nice places to live…
-
comment
Comment #45489953
> Explains why RL helps. Base models never see their own outputs so they can't learn "this concept exists but I can't actually say it." Say "Neuromancer" to the statue, that should…
-
comment
Comment #45287743
> Humans are more efficient watt for watt than any AI ever invented. Indeed they are. For now. The long term trend is not in our favor.
-
comment
Comment #45137717
> block cars in cities a couple of days per week, individually selected per person. The net result in São Paulo (Brazil) for (something that approaches) this is that people end up …
-
comment
Comment #45066807
Local governments in BR have already made ads using generative AI that were shown during prime time TV hours[1]. You can argue that is a bad thing (local designers/content producer…
-
comment
Comment #45039065
> in Brazil it is 20% (sugar cane based) 30% in 2025 for cars (from 27%), 15% biodiesel in diesel for trucks (from 14%). Source: https://www.em.com.br/politica/2025/06/7183470-gove…
-
comment
Comment #44961089
"has existed long before humanity" isn't relevant for my argument. "Will exist long after humanity" -> maybe, maybe not. If we're smart, capable and humble enough, we could, in pri…
-
comment
Comment #44960996
Pretty sure no bacteria will survive on earth after the sun expands enough to char it, yes. Even if I'm wrong, and it does survive _that_, then it eventually won't survive the sun …
-
comment
Comment #44960460
> Choosing what traits one considers exceptional, will by definition select what species one considers exceptional. /Every/ other species that has /ever/ lived will cease to exist …
-
comment
Comment #44367564
You're right to doubt it! And indeed, accounting for externalities (unmeasured or unmeasurable) is a tough economic proposition. If it weren't hard to account for every single vari…
-
comment
Comment #44366492
The counterpoint is that not doing so (implying some sort of infinite monetary loss if the entire human species is wiped out) would mean you want to spend every single unit of mone…
-
comment
Comment #44136962
> I don’t think they can yet self improve exponentially without human intuition yet I agree: if they could, they would be doing it already. Case in point: one of the first things d…
-
comment
Comment #43964172
Is it though? It is my understanding that the quantum fluctuations that give rise to BBs will still exist, even after (and specially after) the evaporation of black holes (perhaps …
-
comment
Comment #43648051
Attempting to summarize your argument (please let me know if I succeeded): Because we can't compare human and LLM architectural substrates, LLMs will never surpass human-level perf…
-
comment
Comment #42802860
Interesting, I have the exact polar opposite perception. I accessed this through a Qubes AppVM (no GPU, limited memory and CPU budget) and the presence of videos makes this a very …
-
comment
Comment #41379951
If a generic human glances at an unfamiliar screen/wall/room, can they accurately, pixel-perfectly reconstruct every single element of it? Can they do it for every single screen th…
-
comment
Comment #39789269
Maybe it's a liability issue, not a competency issue.
-
comment
Comment #36723342
Unless there is a small enough number of them that they can coordinate and all follow the same strategy.
-
comment
Comment #35273330
That ("_every_ money-making industry...") seems like a too strong statement and can be proven false by finding even a single counter-example. gwd's claim (AFAICT) is that _specific…
-
comment
Comment #34912186
My favorite site re: end of the world/universe is the old timer http://exitmundi.nl
-
comment
Comment #34190710
You cannot "generate evidence at will to meet any threshold of evidence" for this specific example ("all swans are white") because, unless you posit that there are swans in Kepler-…
-
comment
Comment #34185847
> You're describing certainty. This is a prediction, not reality. I was being concrete about atoms, in particular , not about what gets named as a "scientific fact" in general. Yes…
-
comment
Comment #34185304
Value != Price, so yes a Toyota may be more valuable than a Lamborghini. A Lamborghini is (in general) objectively _pricier_ than a Toyota. The "value" of a car has more dimensions…