Viewing profile — materielle
materielle
HN member- Joined
- Mon, Aug 21, 2023, 8:43 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 682
- Public activity
- 106 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About materielle
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #48833602
There’s a weird yet common attitude that nobody has to implement operating systems, databases, compilers, cryptography, consensus algorithms, etc because you should use off the she…
-
comment
Comment #48781815
I don’t know anything about Germany’s postal service. In the US, what the parent comment was getting it, is why are we even talking about this in the first place? What problem is p…
-
comment
Comment #48548923
Their argument didn’t make sense to me from the beginning. One of its premises is that The Rich are some cohesive group that can trade amongst themselves in a hermetically sealed e…
-
comment
Comment #48469548
I don’t know if this is the case here, but it’s very hard in general to judge how much software projects ought to cost. Software projects will grow in complexity to consume whateve…
-
comment
Comment #48454268
That’s not so special, though? There’s a difference between Google infra running Google services. Versus any F500 company running their services on GCP. It’s a bit whacky to think …
-
comment
Comment #48430440
What if I don’t care about affording more things? And instead want to live in an ethical society that prioritizes stability and universal access to housing, healthcare, and educati…
-
comment
Comment #48416370
I’m not sure this is generally true, and you’re ignoring a lot of context around the specific situation of GCC. Just to make a point: I could throw out SQLite as a project that ban…
-
comment
Comment #48388691
You’re being sarcastic, but I think you’d be surprised at how often you can say no to managers or even VPs and the c-suite and … have nothing happen to you. I didn’t realize this u…
-
comment
Comment #48360943
One thing I don’t quite understand: Wouldn’t it be in Amazon’s interest to run open models and sell time slots at around the cost of running them? My only guess for why they don’t …
-
comment
Comment #48325009
There’s going to be lots of documentation. It will be AI generated and no human will ever read it. But there will be a lot of it.
-
comment
Comment #48298786
I'm about to leave a shallow comment, but I am a bit skeptical of the supposed drop in inference costs. If AI labs saw a lot of potential there, they'd surely be bragging about it …
-
comment
Comment #48285559
I get what you’re saying, but the housing market is actually a really subtle issue in my opinion. Just one example, owning a home protects you against price shocks. As others have …
-
comment
Comment #48241566
This brings to mind two thoughts: First, that this is challenging to scale across large orgs. Even if your plans produce high quality code, that isn’t true for everyone. I’m defini…
-
comment
Comment #48203650
He didn’t hedge at the end. Nate always writes the models before election season then doesn’t touch them apart from actual bug fixes. The model actually organically predicted 30%. …
-
comment
Comment #48203634
Also, they don’t any plans for the IP, and Nate would’ve paid above-market rate just to take over and preserve the content for posterity. He estimates that they deleted 200,000 hou…
-
comment
Comment #48202034
Which brings us to the next layer of modern dependency management insanity: The fact that basically none of these multi-million dollar companies are vendoring their entire dependen…
-
comment
Comment #48141916
As recently as 2015 when I attended a middling CS program, we had in-person timed exams where we had to write down DSA implementations on a blank sheet of paper in Java. We were de…
-
comment
Comment #48127351
One important piece of context that might make all these stories less confusing for non-googlers: Code references are less important inside Google editors, because we have a code v…
-
comment
Comment #48067927
If you want a laugh, Google a tutorial for how to read a file. You should also know that all the tutorials are wrong, because they fail to handle at least one footgun or another. T…
-
comment
Comment #47859228
Because you can naively iterate through a million items faster than an additional network round trip would take. So a lot of code quality debates don’t matter for the typical enter…
-
comment
Comment #47858067
It’s because in most enterprise contexts: 1) Most bugs are integration bugs. Whereby multiple systems are glued together but there’s something about the API contract that the vario…
-
comment
Comment #47726135
I agree and that’s the point I was trying to make. Linus’s contribution is a great one. He learned from prior tools and contributions, made a lot of smart technical decisions, got …
-
comment
Comment #47726084
Im specifically pointing out the false history that Linus god-coded git and handed it to us on the 7th day. In reality, it was a collaborative effort between multiple smart people …
-
comment
Comment #47726044
It’s not being pedantic. The parent comments are arguing that 17million for git 2.0 is insane because Linux wrote the original in a week. Except that’s not true. He sketched out a …
-
comment
Comment #47725901
I think AI bans are more common in projects where the maintainers are nice people that thoughtfully want to consider each PR and provide a reasoned response if rejected. That’s onl…