Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — massaman_yams

massaman_yams

HN member
Joined
Fri, Apr 25, 2014, 4:51 PM UTC
HN karma
272
Public activity
195 items

About massaman_yams

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #35908572

    Yeah, with a CV strip the Mean Wells with CC dimming have an abrupt shutoff at low brightness - maybe 5% (I haven't measured it), and a brief flash upon increasing brightness just …

  2. comment
    Comment #35903902

    Mean Well has some constant current dimmable 24v power supplies with zero flicker. You'd need 2 if you want each strip to be independently controllable. They also can take a PWM si…

  3. comment
    Comment #35844956

    Can you think of a scenario where a well-intentioned organization doesn't realize they're sending some unwanted mail, and by looking at the right metrics they realize they have a p…

  4. comment
    Comment #35749912

    Speaking from quite a bit of experience, content can matter at Gmail if it's very obviously malicious/spammy, but not usually otherwise. Metrics matter more than content at gmail. …

  5. comment
    Comment #35747759

    I deal with email at global scale, and yes, you're a fringe case. There are many billions of messages sent every day which have lots of links, and which recipients in general are i…

  6. comment
    Comment #35747598

    You're correct that a lot of senders have no idea when they're sending unwanted email, and that unwanted email is well within the realm of possibility here. But don't assume DOI is…

  7. comment
    Comment #35747523

    Gmail is subject to specific targeting by spammers in a way that fastmail is not. The returns for spending weeks or months finding a niche way through Gmail's filters are justified…

  8. comment
    Comment #34473504

    Prefect, dagster, or maybe one could argue google cloud composer is different enough from vanilla airflow that it earns a spot on this list? But you're right, Airflow is still the …

  9. comment
    Comment #33825923

    Another comment suggested an extra rinse cycle.

  10. comment
    Comment #33794587

    It's not the only ambiguous wording in the post; the math doesn't add up here. It's probably a peak of 254 million/hr. "during Black Friday processed a whopping 254 million emails …

  11. comment
    Comment #33576244

    Table S3 here[1] starting on page 9 appears to show nearly 80 different genuses within stool samples after filtering out "vegetative (non–spore form) bacteria, fungi, parasites, an…

  12. comment
    Comment #33575826

    It's not quite clear if this is cultivated or not but I know this MD was working on cultivation at one point. "SER-109 is composed of approximately 50 species of Firmicutes spores …

  13. comment
    Comment #33575738

    Diet alone can't restore strains that don't exist in a patient's microbiome.

  14. comment
    Comment #33555130

    Yes, it's clear Gordon has applied a mastering limiter to the tracks he delivered to Bethesda, and given that the style of the music involves heavy processing/effects and multiple …

  15. comment
    Comment #33542181

    Now, applying a mastering limiter to sub-tracks? Extremely novice mistake, and could be described as brickwalling. Certainly within the realm of possibility given the novice qualit…

  16. comment
    Comment #33542044

    "Brickwall" limiting is about very short-term transient compression; to oversimplify things, those limiters are operating at the timespan of 1-30 milliseconds, more or less. These …

  17. comment
    Comment #33541804

    You're making an extremely pedantic distinction, which is only correct in a purely technical sense. Which is the worst kind of correct. Yes, mastering engineers work from track-lev…

  18. comment
    Comment #32974114

    Delivering to gmail is unpredictable when you try to send from IP space with unmanaged or poorly-managed IP range reputation, like most low-cost VPSes or residential ISP IP space. …

  19. comment
    Comment #32744546

    Is it getting harder to self-host? Yes. Impossible? No. Most senders just find it easier to pay for it.

  20. comment
    Comment #32727158

    Exceptions to the rule do happen; I'm sorry your experience was the exception. Dealing with that kind of thing can be quite a pain if you're not experienced with it. But again: "If…

  21. comment
    Comment #32721969

    This is not my system, to be clear, but you might be surprised how little 20 years of data matters to filter accuracy, empirically speaking; recent sending behavior carries orders …

  22. comment
    Comment #32719607

    The overwhelming majority of legitimate mail will never see anything remotely near a 14-day block. Again, it's reserved for severe, ongoing, high-volume spam scenarios; ISPs use ot…

  23. comment
    Comment #32719164

    > "... small non-spam senders would congregate" Congratulations, you've invented the email service provider. Most small non-spam senders don't want to spend the time figuring out I…

  24. comment
    Comment #32718789

    As a practitioner, I can tell you that this proposal would be quite a bit behind state of the art for email spam filter accuracy. For example, there's a surprising amount of legiti…

  25. comment
    Comment #32718591

    I am not a Google employee, but I do work with email anti-spam at scale. There's a lot to critique here but it boils down to three points: 1. Spam filter behavior has changed becau…