Viewing profile — massaman_yams
massaman_yams
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Apr 25, 2014, 4:51 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 272
- Public activity
- 195 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About massaman_yams
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #35908572
Yeah, with a CV strip the Mean Wells with CC dimming have an abrupt shutoff at low brightness - maybe 5% (I haven't measured it), and a brief flash upon increasing brightness just …
-
comment
Comment #35903902
Mean Well has some constant current dimmable 24v power supplies with zero flicker. You'd need 2 if you want each strip to be independently controllable. They also can take a PWM si…
-
comment
Comment #35844956
Can you think of a scenario where a well-intentioned organization doesn't realize they're sending some unwanted mail, and by looking at the right metrics they realize they have a p…
-
comment
Comment #35749912
Speaking from quite a bit of experience, content can matter at Gmail if it's very obviously malicious/spammy, but not usually otherwise. Metrics matter more than content at gmail. …
-
comment
Comment #35747759
I deal with email at global scale, and yes, you're a fringe case. There are many billions of messages sent every day which have lots of links, and which recipients in general are i…
-
comment
Comment #35747598
You're correct that a lot of senders have no idea when they're sending unwanted email, and that unwanted email is well within the realm of possibility here. But don't assume DOI is…
-
comment
Comment #35747523
Gmail is subject to specific targeting by spammers in a way that fastmail is not. The returns for spending weeks or months finding a niche way through Gmail's filters are justified…
-
comment
Comment #34473504
Prefect, dagster, or maybe one could argue google cloud composer is different enough from vanilla airflow that it earns a spot on this list? But you're right, Airflow is still the …
-
comment
Comment #33825923
Another comment suggested an extra rinse cycle.
-
comment
Comment #33794587
It's not the only ambiguous wording in the post; the math doesn't add up here. It's probably a peak of 254 million/hr. "during Black Friday processed a whopping 254 million emails …
-
comment
Comment #33576244
Table S3 here[1] starting on page 9 appears to show nearly 80 different genuses within stool samples after filtering out "vegetative (non–spore form) bacteria, fungi, parasites, an…
-
comment
Comment #33575826
It's not quite clear if this is cultivated or not but I know this MD was working on cultivation at one point. "SER-109 is composed of approximately 50 species of Firmicutes spores …
-
comment
Comment #33575738
Diet alone can't restore strains that don't exist in a patient's microbiome.
-
comment
Comment #33555130
Yes, it's clear Gordon has applied a mastering limiter to the tracks he delivered to Bethesda, and given that the style of the music involves heavy processing/effects and multiple …
-
comment
Comment #33542181
Now, applying a mastering limiter to sub-tracks? Extremely novice mistake, and could be described as brickwalling. Certainly within the realm of possibility given the novice qualit…
-
comment
Comment #33542044
"Brickwall" limiting is about very short-term transient compression; to oversimplify things, those limiters are operating at the timespan of 1-30 milliseconds, more or less. These …
-
comment
Comment #33541804
You're making an extremely pedantic distinction, which is only correct in a purely technical sense. Which is the worst kind of correct. Yes, mastering engineers work from track-lev…
-
comment
Comment #32974114
Delivering to gmail is unpredictable when you try to send from IP space with unmanaged or poorly-managed IP range reputation, like most low-cost VPSes or residential ISP IP space. …
-
comment
Comment #32744546
Is it getting harder to self-host? Yes. Impossible? No. Most senders just find it easier to pay for it.
-
comment
Comment #32727158
Exceptions to the rule do happen; I'm sorry your experience was the exception. Dealing with that kind of thing can be quite a pain if you're not experienced with it. But again: "If…
-
comment
Comment #32721969
This is not my system, to be clear, but you might be surprised how little 20 years of data matters to filter accuracy, empirically speaking; recent sending behavior carries orders …
-
comment
Comment #32719607
The overwhelming majority of legitimate mail will never see anything remotely near a 14-day block. Again, it's reserved for severe, ongoing, high-volume spam scenarios; ISPs use ot…
-
comment
Comment #32719164
> "... small non-spam senders would congregate" Congratulations, you've invented the email service provider. Most small non-spam senders don't want to spend the time figuring out I…
-
comment
Comment #32718789
As a practitioner, I can tell you that this proposal would be quite a bit behind state of the art for email spam filter accuracy. For example, there's a surprising amount of legiti…
-
comment
Comment #32718591
I am not a Google employee, but I do work with email anti-spam at scale. There's a lot to critique here but it boils down to three points: 1. Spam filter behavior has changed becau…