Viewing profile — martisch
martisch
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Aug 07, 2019, 7:47 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 20
- Public activity
- 5 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About martisch
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #34638999
That is just the language definition. It is fine for an implementation to actually compare both at the same time as long as within the language you can not observe this happend. If…
-
comment
Comment #34324786
Note that afaik [3]string(s) was not valid before go1.20 so no existing code should use it. The semantic equivalent had to be written as *(*[3]string)(s) which also copies the arra…
-
comment
Comment #33673792
> This for loop is less efficient than clearing a map in one operation For maps with keys that are reflexive with == the Go compiler already optimizes the range loop to a single ef…
-
comment
Comment #26159447
The reasoning is here: https://github.com/golang/go/issues/40255 Copy of part of it: 1) While 387 support isn’t a huge maintenance burden, it does take time away from performance a…
-
comment
Comment #20632719
I think this part "Step 1) is not needed with the append approach, as we just reserve a memory location but the previous values stay there until we write them in step 2. " is not w…