Viewing profile — martinknafve
martinknafve
HN member- Joined
- Thu, Jan 08, 2015, 5:28 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 18
- Public activity
- 21 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About martinknafve
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #14394928
Any source for the statement on RSI? I googled but just found anecdotes.
-
comment
Comment #14391965
That would depend on what CDN you use and how it works. If the CDN is just a caching CDN in front of your own site then the CDN typically won't be any more secure than your own sit…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #14316365
One can hope. Blob and table storage still have no form of backup ~8 years after introduction. When I've asked they have been referring to replication and to call them if we accide…
-
comment
Comment #14314331
Actually, I wish Microsoft would stop referring to replication when asked about backup. It's the modern way of saying "You probably don't need backup, because you have RAID". There…
-
comment
Comment #14313900
How do you accomplish no application downtime if for 45 seconds you can't connect to the database? In background processes you might get away with retrying connections for a minute…
-
comment
Comment #14309571
At some point someone will accidentally overwrite or delete data and discover that some days later...
-
comment
Comment #14309554
> If the data is accidently dropped or corrupted, please contact Azure support within 8 hours Thats sounds less then optimal. :)
-
comment
Comment #14309449
No backup/restore?
-
comment
Comment #14286232
OP was referring to creating a hash, signing the hash and publish the signed hash on the web site. The alternative would be to sign the actual binary file using code signing (inter…
-
comment
Comment #14284478
Wouldn't it make more sense to sign the binary then?
- story
-
comment
Comment #14057272
When Verizon enabled this they forgot to test with Firefox ESR. So they disabled enough ciphers that Firefox ESR could no longer connect to their servers. We reported it to them an…
-
comment
Comment #13875576
I reported an issue a week ago and they have had developers verifying it beginning of this week. And that was a low impact bug. The previous issue I reported took 4 months to be ve…
-
comment
Comment #13856828
Why not plan tasks like that continously and make it part of your normal iterations?
-
comment
Comment #11551193
I assume there are several examples of this where there will be a better client for database X than to use this. I rarely use my swiss army knife - if I want to do something seriou…
-
comment
Comment #11253664
Simplified: Instead of modifying a deployment by uninstalling the old software, updating the config files and installing a new version, you create a new virtual machine image with …
- comment
-
comment
Comment #8858047
It's a security patch in the sense that the only way to get the security patches is to install the new version. But thanks for the info. That seems like a pretty bad practice when …
-
comment
Comment #8857862
I can compile the previous versions. I've used the same script for several years, and its not until this version today I have an issue. When seeing the issue, I actually tried comp…
-
comment
Comment #8857525
I'm unable to compile this on Win32 (I don't have any problems compiling older versions). I don't understand how the code could compile for anyone, maybe it's a platform specific i…