Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — martinknafve

martinknafve

HN member
Joined
Thu, Jan 08, 2015, 5:28 PM UTC
HN karma
18
Public activity
21 items

About martinknafve

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #14394928

    Any source for the statement on RSI? I googled but just found anecdotes.

  2. comment
    Comment #14391965

    That would depend on what CDN you use and how it works. If the CDN is just a caching CDN in front of your own site then the CDN typically won't be any more secure than your own sit…

  3. comment
  4. comment
    Comment #14316365

    One can hope. Blob and table storage still have no form of backup ~8 years after introduction. When I've asked they have been referring to replication and to call them if we accide…

  5. comment
    Comment #14314331

    Actually, I wish Microsoft would stop referring to replication when asked about backup. It's the modern way of saying "You probably don't need backup, because you have RAID". There…

  6. comment
    Comment #14313900

    How do you accomplish no application downtime if for 45 seconds you can't connect to the database? In background processes you might get away with retrying connections for a minute…

  7. comment
    Comment #14309571

    At some point someone will accidentally overwrite or delete data and discover that some days later...

  8. comment
    Comment #14309554

    > If the data is accidently dropped or corrupted, please contact Azure support within 8 hours Thats sounds less then optimal. :)

  9. comment
    Comment #14309449

    No backup/restore?

  10. comment
    Comment #14286232

    OP was referring to creating a hash, signing the hash and publish the signed hash on the web site. The alternative would be to sign the actual binary file using code signing (inter…

  11. comment
    Comment #14284478

    Wouldn't it make more sense to sign the binary then?

  12. story
  13. comment
    Comment #14057272

    When Verizon enabled this they forgot to test with Firefox ESR. So they disabled enough ciphers that Firefox ESR could no longer connect to their servers. We reported it to them an…

  14. comment
    Comment #13875576

    I reported an issue a week ago and they have had developers verifying it beginning of this week. And that was a low impact bug. The previous issue I reported took 4 months to be ve…

  15. comment
    Comment #13856828

    Why not plan tasks like that continously and make it part of your normal iterations?

  16. comment
    Comment #11551193

    I assume there are several examples of this where there will be a better client for database X than to use this. I rarely use my swiss army knife - if I want to do something seriou…

  17. comment
    Comment #11253664

    Simplified: Instead of modifying a deployment by uninstalling the old software, updating the config files and installing a new version, you create a new virtual machine image with …

  18. comment
  19. comment
    Comment #8858047

    It's a security patch in the sense that the only way to get the security patches is to install the new version. But thanks for the info. That seems like a pretty bad practice when …

  20. comment
    Comment #8857862

    I can compile the previous versions. I've used the same script for several years, and its not until this version today I have an issue. When seeing the issue, I actually tried comp…

  21. comment
    Comment #8857525

    I'm unable to compile this on Win32 (I don't have any problems compiling older versions). I don't understand how the code could compile for anyone, maybe it's a platform specific i…