Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — mark38848

mark38848

HN member
Joined
Tue, Oct 07, 2014, 11:32 AM UTC
HN karma
109
Public activity
128 items

About mark38848

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #45208535

    Where's the discussion about package sets? Always comparing yourself to Javascript, Java, and friends is obviously easy

  2. comment
    Comment #45156178

    Just use optparse-applicative in PureScript. Applicatives are great for this and the library gives it to you for free.

  3. comment
    Comment #44969203

    Yes, it's written by some disgruntled dev or somebody trying to be funny

  4. comment
    Comment #44820807

    It's still complete dogshit not to be able to have data there. Odin is much better here, iirc

  5. comment
    Comment #44820797

    Yes also the function syntax is weird and ugly because functions aren't expressions.

  6. comment
    Comment #44393976

    What are obnoxious types? Types either represent the data correctly or not. I think you can force types to shut up the compiler in any language including Haskell, Idris, PureScript…

  7. comment
    Comment #44207592

    Yeah. I am a backend dev these days because it pays more. Backend people have this obnoxious attitude of looking down on frontend without having any idea what it entails. Also demo…

  8. comment
    Comment #44188402

    Why not change everything along with it? It can only get better

  9. comment
    Comment #44021015

    Why does everybody want to learn Japanese? What makes Japanese so enticing? Why not Mandarin or at lead Spanish?

  10. comment
    Comment #44001868

    I suppose like the general American of today, he has just never really learnt an n-th language (where n>1).

  11. comment
    Comment #43981053

    Does it support source dependencies over stupid jar files?

  12. comment
    Comment #40858736

    Why not use a fast language like C, Odin, Hare or Zig?

  13. comment
    Comment #40828344

    Observables aren't magic. They're just shit.

  14. comment
    Comment #40828296

    It has no "selling" points. If it had any pecuniary cost nobody would use it.

  15. comment
    Comment #40828288

    I mean you still use Java, so you seem to really like sticking to your tools!

  16. comment
    Comment #40828270

    I use astronvim and still don't know how to get Purescript to work.

  17. comment
    Comment #40823287

    Why wouldn't you feel bad for the person having to write Go after you? Makes no sense to me

  18. comment
    Comment #40756840

    Bun would be cool if it worked. At least it's not written in Rust so there's that.

  19. comment
    Comment #40472823

    I think Minecraft was originally written in Java and rewritten in a good programming language (i.e. not Java).

  20. comment
    Comment #40463368

    PureScript is arguably the prettiest functional programming language and it compiles to JS (or Erlang, or C++, or Go, or Chez Scheme, or Kotlin, or C)

  21. comment
    Comment #40399851

    Anything related to Java dying is a win in my book

  22. comment
  23. comment
    Comment #40333788

    There is no programming language as scary as Java

  24. comment
    Comment #40326520

    PureScript also has them (as a library).

  25. comment
    Comment #40221502

    How the fuck do you release a language without enums?