Viewing profile — maltelandwehr
maltelandwehr
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Jul 07, 2017, 9:44 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 326
- Public activity
- 108 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About maltelandwehr
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #47602987
Did you actually conduct the experiment? What was the outcome? Based on my experiments (across hundreds of thousands of LLM chats) llms.txt does not have any measurable impact in t…
-
comment
Comment #47571642
I actually think the AI Overviews from Google have improved a lot in the last 2 years. They used to be trash. And now they are often good-enough so that I do not even switch to Cha…
-
comment
Comment #47571632
Pure non-AI googling will not work since many websites now use AI to create content. And so far, no search engine has managed to reliable detect and filter that out.
-
comment
Comment #46763130
I like the idea. But currently the only thing I can see is "shift from model capability discussion toward tool and workflow integration". This does not really motivate me to create…
-
comment
Comment #46729844
Was this supposed to just be a link to another Hacker News thread?
-
comment
Comment #45983031
And there are a ton of open roles! https://peec.ai/careers
-
comment
Comment #45887987
Looks interesting! Which LLM are you using under the hood?
-
comment
Comment #45718479
The author is referring to the concept of "authority" as it is used in SEO-circles. Since a lot of websites link to MSN, Forbes, and the NYT, they have a high Page Rank. This is in…
-
comment
Comment #45666009
In the past, you would type a question into Google. To get the full, detailed answer you had to click on the Wikipedia search result. With ChatGPT or Google AI Mode, you get all an…
-
comment
Comment #45665886
> people having AI talk to their partner about deep relationship stuff. I have read stories about people using AI to write their Tinder messages, eulogies, etc. Gives me a weird/st…
-
comment
Comment #45665852
Many things contributors are doing could be handled by AI agents. We would just need a good system to a) keep humans in the loop and b) sort out bad actors.
-
comment
Comment #45665836
If if all this is true, LLMs would still need to create a repository of such aggregated "summarizations of secondary sources". LLMs cannot in real time find and read thousands of s…
-
comment
Comment #45665805
I like to idea of using AI to make Wikipedia better. There are many small tasks simple AI agents could handle. For example: Go to every article in the English Wikipedia of a Spanis…
-
comment
Comment #45613976
Everyone benefits! Similar to when Google pushed people to make mobile-friendly websites, fast websites, secure websites, etc.
-
comment
Comment #45589519
> putting our competitors down I did not put anybody down. I am surprised people still start to build in this very crowded space. I was genuinely hoping for a unique twist/idea - l…
-
comment
Comment #45576895
What does Ranksmith do different from Profound, Peec AI, Athena and the 100+ other tools in this space?
-
comment
Comment #45464753
Google is using a special version of Gemini (fast, small) and a special version of their internal ranking API (faster, fewer anti-spam/quality measures). That makes them very fast.…
-
comment
Comment #45423010
Regular Cloudflare + heavy caching should solve all crawling problems, no? For most bot visits, there should not be a single database request.
-
comment
Comment #45369748
Having a unique brand name certainly makes it easier for both humans and LLMs to identify the brand mentions and attribute those to your brand.
-
comment
Comment #45266967
Google must really be feeling the pressure from ChatGPT. They picked up pace in a very noticeable way.
-
comment
Comment #45266955
No. In the end Google was allowed to keep Chrome and their advertising business.
-
comment
Comment #45262530
will AI visibility standards like this become part of the search/marketing infrastructure No. The AIVO Standard will not become part of the search/marketing infrastructure. Adoptio…
-
comment
Comment #45246948
Super interesting to see how - for the same set of prompts - GPT and Claude rely on just 50-60 domains while Perplexity and Gemini cite 100-140.
-
comment
Comment #45232872
Hi, Malte from Peec AI here. It is wrong that our "snapshots" are not reproducible. Also, AIVO and PSOS are made up concept that nobody but you is using or accepts. Just because yo…
-
comment
Comment #45232835
Can you explain the exploited part? My understanding is they performed work and were paid for it at market rate. So just regular capitalism. Or was there more to it?