Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — maltalex

maltalex

HN member
Joined
Wed, Oct 04, 2017, 10:01 PM UTC
HN karma
3,952
Public activity
679 items

About maltalex

Contact me at (random forwarding address, changed once in a while)

Recent public activity

  1. story
  2. story
  3. comment
    Comment #48243684

    This looks suspiciously cheap. The same model hosted by other providers is much more expensive [0]. So either DeepSeek can host it much cheaper than anyone else, or their business …

  4. comment
    Comment #48229722

    Any automation-friendly email hosting is going to have a serious spam problem, and therefore a blacklisting problem. I suggest taking a look at what providers like Sendgrid, Mailch…

  5. comment
    Comment #48144452

    An alternative explanation for this “over-hiring” is that many companies’ operating expenses have grown substantially because of AI spending. Companies can either eat the additiona…

  6. comment
    Comment #48057893

    > 1. human verification for auth. How, at scale?

  7. comment
    Comment #47726697

    Wouldn't a "WebRip" have to come from a streaming service by definition?

  8. story
  9. comment
    Comment #47604742

    Only with certificate pinning or something similar. Otherwise, the attacker can get valid TLS certificates for any domain hosted on the hijacked IP addresses.

  10. comment
    Comment #47602055

    Here are some examples: The attacker can impersonate the victim, get a valid x509 certificate issued to it, and create a perfect replica of their website/api/whatever. The attacker…

  11. comment
    Comment #47601086

    RPKI doesn't make BGP safe, it makes it safer . BGP hijacks can still happen. RPKI only secures the ownership information of a given prefix, not the path to that prefix. Under RPKI…

  12. comment
    Comment #47559479

    Absolutely. They've made the same mess with "Copilot" as with ".NET" in the early 00's [0]. Everything was ".NET" from consumer oriented services (".NET Passport"), to "Visual Stud…

  13. comment
    Comment #47557799

    “Copilot” is not one product, it’s around 15 different products, seriously. I think that people often compare apples to oranges by comparing the “copilot” they have in Windows/Offi…

  14. story
  15. story
  16. comment
    Comment #47331311

    > and nobody cares Everyone cares. In fact, there's an entire industry of tools being developed to solve this very problem. The current governance gaps are obvious to anyone who's …

  17. comment
    Comment #47241636

    Maybe I'm missing something, but isn't this the same as writing code, but with extra steps? Currently, engineers work with loose specifications, which they translate into code. Wit…

  18. comment
  19. comment
    Comment #47101458

    > Dependabot has some value IME, but all naïve tools that only check software and version numbers against a vulnerability database tend to be noisy if they don’t then do something …

  20. comment
    Comment #47043580

    It's not just open source though. Many high quality sources of information are being (over-)exploited and hurt in the process. StackOverflow is effectively dead [0], the internet a…

  21. comment
    Comment #46949020

    > you are both confusing two issues. How am I confusing the two? My whole point was the same as yours - that the existence of lawful intercept is a separate issue and that the focu…

  22. comment
    Comment #46947898

    I get that you don't like lawful intercept. That's fine. But focusing on only that aspect of telcos derails the conversation and prevents us (in the very broad sense of "us") from …

  23. comment
    Comment #46947154

    Even if the back door wasn't there, you wouldn't want nation state hackers anywhere near telecoms since they're critical infrastructure. Telecoms should be highly secure. Period.

  24. comment
    Comment #46947070

    Yes, telecoms should be forced to invest in their own security if they're not doing it. But the focus on the back door misses the point in my opinion. Even if the back door wasn't …

  25. comment
    Comment #46946468

    The problem isn't the back door. Every telecom company in every country provides access for "lawful intercept". Phone taps have been a thing for decades and as far as I know, requi…