Viewing profile — madcadmium
madcadmium
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Sep 28, 2022, 9:40 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 47
- Public activity
- 31 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About madcadmium
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #43805491
> by all metrics, immigrants are a net positive to society. What about wage suppression?
-
comment
Comment #42915165
"Someday, the sky will fall" Ok.
-
comment
Comment #42800677
> This would provide an incredibly precise estimate of the user's location. Within ~250 miles of their location is not "incredibly precise"
-
comment
Comment #42641563
I would like to read this article but am unwilling to provide even a fake e-mail address to do so
-
comment
Comment #41583800
I wonder how many of their telecom devices like routers, switches, etc. have bombs implanted in their power supplies
-
comment
Comment #41583796
I wonder how many of their telecom devices like routers, switches, etc. have bombs implanted in their power supplies
-
comment
Comment #41537540
His wealthy parents, probably
-
comment
Comment #41537519
Does it also monitor the contents of your copy/paste buffer? It would scoop up a ton of privileged data if so.
-
comment
Comment #41317139
> Operations and Sysadmins I don't forsee ever changing, especially with AI. Why not?
-
comment
Comment #40942756
Yes, the woman who started Ark Invest because it was "God's will"
-
comment
Comment #40363480
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #40153377
When I managed a large fleet of EC2 instances running CentOS I had Ansible running locally on each machine via a cron job. I only used remote SSH to orchestrate deployments (stop s…
-
comment
Comment #40137559
How much leverage though?
-
comment
Comment #40137007
Yeah, I was really confused. This guy loves his BMW M3 but wants to ditch it for a Tesla?
-
comment
Comment #39848348
It's in the article: > Ken didn’t know it when all this was happening (and it’s not at all obvious from the Apple prompts), but clicking “Allow” would not have allowed the attacker…
-
comment
Comment #39095623
Oh, the irony!
-
comment
Comment #38935231
You can control what messages you receive by closing your client
-
comment
Comment #38933531
The remaining employee's workloads are about to increase 50%
-
comment
Comment #38456579
Because people who don't bother to read the article assume it's a new breach, as we can see in the comments here ("another breach"). I'm not saying that it makes it better or worse…
-
comment
Comment #38456202
This is not a new breach, it is a disclosure of additional findings from the last breach.
-
comment
Comment #38456194
This is not a new breach, it is a disclosure of additional findings from the last breach.
-
comment
Comment #38456191
This is not a new breach, it is a disclosure of additional findings from the last breach.
-
comment
Comment #38313134
That's rich coming from IBM
-
comment
Comment #38144222
This is karma for their passive-aggressive blog post about Okta's security incident one week earlier
-
comment
Comment #37981475
Isn't Equifax part of a de facto monopoly? Okta doesn't have that luxury. Security is also not Equifax's core competency, but it is supposed to be Okta's. I would be happy for you …