Viewing profile — madanMus
madanMus
HN member- Joined
- Tue, Apr 14, 2015, 6:50 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 1
- Public activity
- 5 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About madanMus
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #9377914
yes, you did read correctly. The 1-3% does assume a non-standard whole-program analysis. Something more practical on existing hardware will look more like the E numbers (for escape…
-
comment
Comment #9372603
Yes, it does, provided programmers restrict themselves to the safe subset of the language. Rust is a wonderful step in the right direction.
-
comment
Comment #9372599
[I am one of the authors of the paper.] The paper reports overhead numbers from existing research. For instance, see Figure 18 in http://arxiv.org/abs/1312.1411 , which shows the c…
-
comment
Comment #9372526
But the math is currently broken for Java. See http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.112... . Here the authors show that most common compiler optimizations are J…
-
comment
Comment #9372511
The article does not ignore architectures like ARM. You do need fences, but not all the time - the compiler can avoid fences in places where there is no danger of violating sequent…