Viewing profile — machinebun
machinebun
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Feb 10, 2021, 10:48 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 57
- Public activity
- 44 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About machinebun
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #28165397
Well, I disagree with that, and if I can get enough people to agree with me, we can pass laws to make it unprofitable for people to buy out housing and have it sit empty. Also know…
-
comment
Comment #28156203
You will still have to pay capital gains tax in $ once you pay for something in Bitcoin though (assuming that your bitcoin has appreciated versus the $)
-
comment
Comment #28138629
Short answer is no. There is no good way to measure the value generated by an individual engineer in most cases (in large enough companies), only the total/average value produced b…
-
comment
Comment #28138618
Those frictional costs (of moving) are the whole problem. SF salaries are where they are at because of those frictional costs (people choosing not to move to SF, whether by persona…
-
comment
Comment #28138560
The SF salary is high because of high demand and low supply (of competent engineers). If you move remote, you increase the supply of competent engineers (there are likely people in…
-
comment
Comment #28138500
No, since there is no good way to measure how much a person's individual work is worth (in software engineering). There are ways to do that in finance and sales - that's why the pa…
-
comment
Comment #28138386
Yes, and the cost of labor in that case is not everyone getting an SF salary, it's everyone getting a much lower (but equal) salary. Part of the reason that SF salaries still exist…
-
comment
Comment #28138360
> Again, not true. That employee can simply... move. You've ignored that. Well, yes, but we're arguing that they have the same leverage in their new place of residence as they did …
-
comment
Comment #28138339
Have you missed out on the last 50 years of history of American labor and union busting? Programmers are not special snowflakes in this regard, just currently in a very friendly ma…
-
comment
Comment #28138260
Pay cuts are a pretty accepted alternative to layoffs during recessions... I think it certainly depends. It's more of an ethical question - as legally, I'm pretty sure the company …
-
comment
Comment #28138253
> Except that a Google employee moving to someplace with a weaker economy has not reduced their leverage. These are people who have the power to simply move back. A Google employee…
-
comment
Comment #28138207
I keep hearing the trope of "people are paid the value of their work" come up, and it's completely false and absurd. People are paid the market clearing price (a.k.a. better or equ…
-
comment
Comment #27627370
Whenever two people have conflicting absolute rights, who's right is more absolute? That's why rights are always relative. The Bill of Rights is a good starting place, but any law …
-
comment
Comment #27624357
The innocent until proven guilty only applies in criminal court, not in civil court by the way. Personal privacy is good, but there are some societal things that should supersede t…
-
comment
Comment #27624253
We have a disagreement in what makes a public figure then. I believe that over a certain level of wealth, the wealth alone makes someone a public figure or a figure of significance…
-
comment
Comment #27624202
I believe that if the leak is proven to be in the public interest, no one should go to jail (but that it should be the rare exception). I also don't believe Snowden deserves to be …
-
comment
Comment #27624136
> purchased his founders’ shares in PayPal through his Roth IRA during PayPal’s formation." > That's literally the market rate. That's not a market rate, that's a price-fixed rate.…
-
comment
Comment #27624081
Sure - there's no problem with valuing those shares at $0.001 in general, because there's not much that valuation matters for in the short term (eventually you will pay different t…
-
comment
Comment #27624018
What happened was Thiel buying 1.7M shares of stock in his own startup at a value of $0.001 per share in 1999 in his Roth IRA (and then cashing out for $30M+ in 2002). It's debatab…
-
comment
Comment #27623954
Sure, $0.001 is the value on paper (and under current law). The point is, it's exploitable (let's say I'm an Apple engineer, I start a new company and get a wink wink from some fri…
-
comment
Comment #27623610
> Debating wether tax returns should or should not be public is a great debate to have, I agree. The country should be having that debate. And if we decide tax returns should be ma…
-
comment
Comment #27593204
It's a complicated relationship. The prices of assets are related to the price of debt (the cheaper the debt, the more expensive the asset). Housing is an asset that pays a coupon …
-
comment
Comment #27592920
Due to hedonic adaptation, what matters is not the absolute state of existence, but the trajectory that that state takes throughout your life. (a small positive slope in terms of l…
-
comment
Comment #27417423
McDonald's has been reducing their number of workers and franchising as per their 2016-2017 plan. So most of the people that work at McD are not even their employees (since McD the…
-
comment
Comment #27387698
> Markets are not optimized for quality of life. It's one variable of many in a system evolved to coerce the many to benefit the few. You need enough buy in from enough companies t…