Viewing profile — ly3xqhl8g9
ly3xqhl8g9
HN member- Joined
- Thu, Jul 23, 2020, 6:41 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 1,246
- Public activity
- 462 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About ly3xqhl8g9
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #36964121
Not to worry. I will not comment anymore. Please delete my account.
-
comment
Comment #36954996
True. That's why we probably need another mechanism for incentivizing high-risk/high-reward/multi-decennial research. Perhaps, even if LK99 is not real, something interesting will …
-
comment
Comment #36954879
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #36954106
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #36954091
Sure, it doesn't spread down to 1901, but the uptick started around 1970s [1]. Anyway, my main rant was about the inefficiency of giving awards to "lone geniuses", at most three, o…
-
comment
Comment #36953631
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #36953484
"In no case may a prize amount be divided between more than three persons." [1] Sad state of affairs to expect a reward for brilliance and to have science bottlenecked by a merchan…
-
comment
Comment #36941470
Interestingly enough, penny pushing also destroys capitalism, see The Man Who Broke Capitalism: How Jack Welch Gutted the Heartland and Crushed the Soul of Corporate America―and Ho…
-
comment
Comment #36941164
Regardless if LK-99 is truly a Room-Temperature Superconductor or not, only 112 years passed since Heike Kamerlingh Onnes discovered superconductivity on April 8, 1911, 4 PM [1] [2…
-
comment
Comment #36930148
There is no use in synthesizing (C6H6O·CH2O)n [1] (or LK-99, to be actual, real or not) that is not cost effective. It's precisely this penny pusher rhetoric which in the end will …
-
comment
Comment #36930057
Economic limits are imaginary, secondhand effects of the ideological goggles one's society decides to wear at a certain time for arbitrary reasons. USA during the Manhattan Project…
-
comment
Comment #36928841
We are ridiculously far from physical limits in our current artificial computers (both theoretical [1], and practical [2]). For more technical details see Jim Keller: [3] [4] [5]. …
-
comment
Comment #36917269
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #36907068
"I am the publisher now."
-
comment
Comment #36862193
Until a synthetic agent will be here we can only guess. The current best guesses seem to have to do with the free energy principle, active inference, Markov blankets [1]. It might …
-
comment
Comment #36848042
Just avoiding the inevitable I suppose: June 22, 2023, "Ford agrees to $9.2 billion US government loan" [1]. That's the joke in the end: there are no companies (and there is no gov…
-
comment
Comment #36847748
Can I, just a random citizen, get a loan from the government for not even billions or hundreds of millions but let's say $100,000? I will of course repay "in due course, at the app…
-
comment
Comment #36847196
It's in the first paragraph of the linked article [1]. They were called "loans" in the government-speak of the post-2008 crash, but if you look at the semantics, they were just ris…
-
comment
Comment #36847143
An "everything app" is just an operating system. There is nothing to picture, we've been having them since the 1950s [1]. We could imagine some new way of operating over systems: f…
-
comment
Comment #36846861
Not lucky, subsidized [1]. [1] Company with $15 million revenue in 2008 gets $465 million "loan" in 2009, https://techcrunch.com/2009/06/23/the-government-comes-throu... https://ww…
-
comment
Comment #36786750
Not quite. Corruption is the side-effect of interpersonal relationships. Once the cluster of the organization's/society's leaders are random, and with a sufficiently aggressive ran…
-
comment
Comment #36784120
Watched 1978, Blue Collar [1] recently, given also the WGA/SAG-AFTRA strike, and was thinking on the forced master-slave dialectic [2] between the union representative and the work…
-
comment
Comment #36745060
There was a trend in the paper blogs, the diaries of 1930s [1], probably when they were at peak, of authors whining about authorship, perhaps due to an esprit du mal of the epoch: …
-
comment
Comment #36706715
"I suggested we use a strong cloth tape to close seams, and make tab of same. It worked fine, I showed it to different government inspectors they said it was all right, but I could…
-
comment
Comment #36706235
Curiously enough, not really, from the post: Excuse me, is it "duct" or "duck" tape? I mean sure, "duct tape" and "duck tape" are both fine. "Duct tape" is the more common name tod…