Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — luthaf

luthaf

HN member
Joined
Sun, Aug 28, 2016, 9:43 PM UTC
HN karma
16
Public activity
9 items

About luthaf

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #21684807

    > I found their interfaces especially for simple things (traversing atoms/bonds in a molecule) quite unwieldy. Somehow the same for me, this is part of why I started my own project…

  2. comment
    Comment #21678246

    What do you think is missing in the current offering (OpenBabel, RDKIT, maybe some other I am missing)? Context: I do research in computational chemistry, and write an open source …

  3. comment
    Comment #18626910

    Better distributed computing libraries and semantics (MPI, OpenSHMEM, ...). At the language level, it is not completely clear how RMDA and lifetimes/references should interact. Bet…

  4. comment
    Comment #15722730

    I have a C++ project that is available in multiple languages (Python, Rust, Fortran, Julia and JS), and I decided not to use SWIG partly because of this issue. Instead, I manually …

  5. comment
    Comment #14371739

    Yep, I will definitively try to compile my Rust MD code to emscripten and give it a look! There are quite a few JS molecules visualizers, so the outcome can be pretty nice for teac…

  6. comment
    Comment #13212353

    Yes, but `using MyModule` is (was?) the default and preferred way to use a module. Which is equivalent to recommend everyone to do `from module import *` in Python.

  7. comment
    Comment #13208813

    Yep, Julia is a very nice language with very good performances. But I abandoned it because it is not (yet?) oriented toward library development, and more usable in exploratory styl…

  8. comment
    Comment #13208793

    > I don't know the particular multidimensional array discussion you experienced, but evolving a language takes slow time, and meanwhile people experiment with what is possible out-…

  9. comment
    Comment #12378691

    > there is starting to be funding for software maintenance Any reference concerning this point? I am interested!