Viewing profile — luispedrocoelho
luispedrocoelho
HN member- Joined
- Sun, Oct 28, 2012, 1:34 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 111
- Public activity
- 58 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About luispedrocoelho
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
- story
- story
- story
- story
- story
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #17564861
It's not clear to me if google is allowed to demand that non-google app phones not be called Android or if that would also be considered anti-competitive. If they must allow Androi…
-
comment
Comment #17557804
As a matter of law, the EC may be right, but as a matter of user experience, the idea that the Android market suffers from not having enough OEM-installed software on devices is a …
-
comment
Comment #17552332
But he did not purchase health insurance, he purchased travel insurance. It seems to me that the whole thing is "I bought travel insurance and I thought I would be getting global h…
-
comment
Comment #17552236
> In reality, most claimants are going to spend much less than 1% of that £5 million limit before they get flown home. It only really applies to people who are at death's door and …
-
comment
Comment #17552217
I never claimed it was in bad faith and I don't think it was. Considering incentives and conflicts of interest is perfectly normal and does not mean that someone is operating in ba…
-
comment
Comment #17551723
The incentive to say so is pretty clear: if he flies away, not only does the doctor lose a 15,000 costumer, he can also be liable if anything does go wrong. Maybe he was indeed in …
-
comment
Comment #17550715
To be sure, travel insurance is very often a very good idea. But it's travel insurance not "whole-world, any hospital, health insurance" (which I am sure you can buy, but not at th…
-
comment
Comment #17550535
From his telling, the company was not very communicative when he contacted them, but, fundamentally, saying he should fly back to the UK for treatment and they'll cover the flight …
-
comment
Comment #16515398
The reply in the uber blog is less "angry tweet" than "good peer review": it points to a very specific methodological weakness which has bearing on the final conclusions.
-
comment
Comment #16324548
For some things, we do. But databases are not magical and setting up a good table/index system &c is also work and there is overhead. Thus, if we are talking about having (for exam…
-
comment
Comment #16324482
`isin` is worse in terms of performance as it does linear iteration of the array. Reading in chunks is not bad (and you can just use `chunksize=...` as a parameter to `read_csv`), …
-
comment
Comment #16323560
1. No, that function was the bottleneck, by far, and I can tell you that >10,000x was what we got between the initial version and the final one. 2. I don't care about faster at thi…
-
comment
Comment #16323320
That is the _FAST_ version of the code (people keep saying "of course, it's slow", when it's the fast version). Here is an earlier version (intermediate speed): https://git.embl.de…
-
comment
Comment #16323008
If I can fit the code into numpy-like structure, then Python is typically fine. The issue is when I cannot.
-
comment
Comment #16322849
That may be the case. However, my point is that we started with a rather direct implementation of a formula in a paper. This was very easy to write but took hours on a test set (wh…
-
comment
Comment #16322789
You are commenting on the variant of the code that is fast enough that it doesn't matter.
-
comment
Comment #16322780
"spending an hour figuring out what arcane incantation I need to pass to np.einsum to get the operation I want" Yes, I have also had this experience and I hate how in the end, the …
-
comment
Comment #16322750
I think this is part of my argument: as datasets grow faster than single-core CPU speed, performance matters more and more.