Viewing profile — lucd
lucd
HN member- Joined
- Mon, May 11, 2015, 9:37 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 251
- Public activity
- 85 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About lucd
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #48921169
The worst about the SpaceX IPO is Nasdaq changing their inclusion rules for the Nasdaq 100. The index fast-tracked SpaceX stock for inclusion 15 days after the IPO, instead of the …
-
comment
Comment #40619365
Kind of ironic reading this and then finding https://github.com/customer-stories/nytimes , huh? Wonder how GitHub wasn't able to detect a single token downloading the entire organi…
-
comment
Comment #34135605
"Persons who received the BA.5-containing bivalent booster had better neutralizing activity against all Omicron subvariants (especially against BA.2.75.2, BQ.1.1 and XBB) than thos…
-
comment
Comment #34135580
I'm not sure I understand you.. Do you deplore that Sinovac and Sputnik aren't available in Australia? Really?
-
comment
Comment #32746860
Only purpose of this kind of initiative is to cause trouble.. Marketed by the same trolls who spread medical disinfo, climate negationism, Russian propaganda..
-
comment
Comment #31996635
What eliminates social cohesion and trust is * the disease itself * the people instrumentalizing the disease and/or the sanitary measures to partisan ends..
-
comment
Comment #30298667
If there was such obvious nefarious and severe effects, pharmacovigilance would have seen it. Malone is one of the worst disinformer https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/202…
-
comment
Comment #30298636
The vaccine antigen is only a small part of the virus. Furthermore is was modified and is inert. https://cen.acs.org/pharmaceuticals/vaccines/tiny-tweak-behi... Because of internat…
-
comment
Comment #28169369
Not peer reviewed, not published, anonymous authors. This is a fake meta-analysis. The most important study that weighted in IVM favor was bogus and was retracted some days ago.
-
comment
Comment #28169253
Nowhere in the paper I read that ADE was detected in the vaccined. Vaccine-induced ADE is only evocated as a possibility. That's a letter to the editor.. That's an expert opinion a…
-
comment
Comment #27946996
Tess Lawrie co-wrote a meta-analysis that was crowd-funded, on the premises that ivermectin is working against covid.. That doesn't bode well for its neutrality, does it ? https://…
-
comment
Comment #27946957
Tess Lawrie ? The same Tess Lawrie who wrote a fraudulent pharmacovigilance analysis claiming that covid vaccines are unsafe, based on the arbitrary claim that anything bad happeni…
-
comment
Comment #27395091
Insufficient scientific data, no rationale After chloroquine, same kind of fallacies are used to push ivermectine.. "Ivermectin has been shown to inhibit the replication of SARS-Co…
-
comment
Comment #26141015
Here is some chart showing vaccination effect on hospitalization for severe forms. Very telling. https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/israel-severe-hospitaliza...
-
comment
Comment #26140984
The 94% effectiveness isonly reached one week after the second shot. Only 27% got the two shots. Also Israël recently got the UK strain which is far more transmissible.
- comment
-
comment
Comment #25173009
*NeXT computer
-
comment
Comment #24282862
Where was Simone Gold fired from? If you look at her LinkedIn profile she is working as a concierge physician for 9 years, she worked as a congressional fellow.. never worked as an…
-
comment
Comment #24282783
Healthier as less comorbidites..
-
comment
Comment #24274652
At least five peer-reviewed RCTs were published, more are on their way..Each of them negative. Science was done.
-
comment
Comment #24274477
"scientists express doubts about coronavirus treatment touted as breakthough by Trump " What is the problem with this Washington Post headlines? Didn't scientists express doubts ab…
-
comment
Comment #24274344
Both-sidism: in evidence-based medecine, a treatment is ineffective until it is proven effective. Now that some monthes have passed, at least five peer-reviewed RCTs were conducted…
-
comment
Comment #24274299
Please tell me who are the authors of the website you mentioned and tell me what is the methodology they used for selecting the studies and rating them.
-
comment
Comment #24274193
A subgroup analysis by self-reported zinc usage was done in the post-exposure prophylaxis RCT . No effect. https://twitter.com/methodsmanmd/status/1293350242310590464
-
comment
Comment #24274129
Yes mean difference −4.5 days,with a low certainty.. They also say: Hydroxychloroquine might increase the risk of adverse events compared with the other interventions And no eviden…