Viewing profile — lucajona
lucajona
HN member- Joined
- Sat, Oct 29, 2011, 10:19 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 143
- Public activity
- 40 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About lucajona
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #40140256
For context, I started an open source project that is arguably 10x more popular than Nutjs (20k stars on github vs 2k). I also gave up on maintaining it, but others stepped in to t…
-
comment
Comment #30003420
Mirror: https://archive.is/aAf3K
- story
-
comment
Comment #13793534
I don't understand why the media and Silicon Valley seem to be gleefully awaiting the downfall of Uber. If Uber's business model is not financially viable then the free market will…
-
comment
Comment #13480201
Okay sure, I made a bad generalisation. Some true statements can be uninteresting. The point I was trying to make was more that the parent commenter was making a true statement abo…
-
comment
Comment #13480151
Those "anti-intellectual slogans" I think you mean can also be seen as arguments for a return to enlightenment values instead of an entrenched, elitist dogmatism. Behind those slog…
-
comment
Comment #13478949
I don't think it's fair to call a correct statement vacuous. More nuanced than it appears, and easily misinterpreted maybe. I think it's fair to point out that peer review doesn't …
-
comment
Comment #10232645
Good point. But if the only way you can avoid malaria is if someone gives you a bed net, then your ability to improve your own circumstances is still close to 0. You're still impov…
-
comment
Comment #10232521
This hits on the problem with "Effective Altruism" — it is exactly the bad form of utilitarian thinking. It seems purely about reallocating some wealth from the rich to the poor. T…
-
comment
Comment #10028170
... and then read Pinker's reply http://stevenpinker.com/files/pinker/files/comments_on_taleb... TLDR: The book’s structure was lost on Taleb, who blends the different chapters and…
-
comment
Comment #9222160
You're right, I think we should believe him when he says that he was tortured. It's the part where he claims that it was at the direction of the FBI that needs proof. And I agree, …
-
comment
Comment #9216347
I don't know why this was downvoted, it seems like a valid question. I suppose I will get downvoted too, but I think it's worth discussing this now, since it's made the front page …
-
comment
Comment #7035558
Yep, Scoop has Rust 0.9 now.
-
comment
Comment #6672840
Thanks!
-
comment
Comment #6668247
Thank you so much! I've seen that before but assumed the /a 'administrative install' meant UAC popups. Just tried it now (with /qn though) and it's UI-free. Very cool!
-
comment
Comment #6668223
Yes that's true for common programs like less, tail, grep, awk, and sed. I do think Scoop can give you better support for ln and sudo though. Then on top of that, Scoop lets you in…
-
comment
Comment #6668186
Good question. I think you'd want to pick Cygwin when you want to be able to compile and run POSIX apps on Windows without having to modify them too much. However, if you just want…
-
comment
Comment #6668107
I totally agree. Self-contained installs without side-effects are the goal for Scoop, and it's almost there. Scoop extracts NSIS/NullSoft and InnoSetup installers already, and if a…
-
comment
Comment #6667430
The 'extras' bucket for Scoop is a good fit things that aren't open source command-line tools, but are still useful dev tools. Teamcity should fit well there: https://github.com/lu…
-
comment
Comment #6667421
If you read HN and your organisation treats you like 'Joe user', I'd say you probably feel pretty oppressed. Scoop is aimed pretty squarely at HN readers, not so much at people tha…
-
comment
Comment #6667349
You're going to have to set-execution policy yourself—I highly recommend it though for a useable shell ;) So far there are 59 apps in the main bucket: https://github.com/lukesampso…
-
comment
Comment #6667336
Author here. I use Chocolatey too, although not so often recently. Scoop is more focused on open-source command-line developer tools. I expect Scoop will appeal more to cross-platf…
-
comment
Comment #6667316
Fortunately, it's much easier to write packages for Scoop (aka "app manifests"). You only really need to know JSON, whereas with Chocolatey you need some Powershell and Nuget chops…
-
comment
Comment #6667308
My condolences to anyone reading HN who works for one of these organisations. The iex [remote-script] probably will run in that case actually, just not the 'scoop' command. Which s…
-
comment
Comment #6667217
Powershell really is crippled by default, unlike bash. Your equivalent is only equivalent (the sudo part) if you start powershell with 'run as administrator', which you probably sh…