Viewing profile — lsseckman
lsseckman
HN member- Joined
- Sun, Apr 14, 2013, 10:52 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 48
- Public activity
- 61 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About lsseckman
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #29493266
thank you!
-
comment
Comment #25491156
[2017]
- comment
-
comment
Comment #18483235
> And why do many ordinary Americans experience such outrage on behalf of these multinationals These are companies we all helped build in one way or another. Their revenues boost o…
-
comment
Comment #17435325
you *could do recurring payments on Ethereum
-
comment
Comment #16605881
Hearst did this, was some outcry about it
-
comment
Comment #16279950
thaaaaaaank you
-
comment
Comment #16245109
right, but the point is that those products won't maintain the company valuation. lots of people have heard about AIM, but it didn't save AOL
-
comment
Comment #16229417
If Google's asset was so powerful you'd think their other products would be doing better. (google+, glass, Allo, etc)
-
comment
Comment #16123632
hey do you have any more info about this? have been wanting to do something similar.
-
comment
Comment #15812777
Price wouldn’t drop unless you actually sold.
-
comment
Comment #15565684
Are you aware of the book The Circle?
-
comment
Comment #15427781
if you're taking 2009 as a reference point, you have to wonder whether Bitcoin is the CDO market, or the banks investing in those markets. Both failed, only one was bailed out.
-
comment
Comment #15390274
That's more of what I would expect! Does that make it feel more like he was intentionally storing company files in a personal account?
-
comment
Comment #15390113
"He [Lewandowski] also said it was common practice to share work files via Dropbox" Always interesting seeing company employees not using their company's products. Shows that what …
-
comment
Comment #15132141
oh, the script just executes a buying strategy that avoids short term fluctuations. It's not a profit-making strategy.
-
comment
Comment #15003278
Are you actually sending that amount around?
-
comment
Comment #15003277
Are you actually sending that amount around?
-
comment
Comment #14907985
http://www.baidu.com/ https://www.google.com/
-
comment
Comment #14758308
I like this, I'm using it. I'll contribute that this is a good way to explain to someone why corporations inherently care about their employees only to the extent of their usefulne…
-
comment
Comment #14437000
this is a great point. And given market caps I doubt there are any sizeable funds invested, which may point to no bubble at all.
-
comment
Comment #14340717
> The logical conclusion to that would be that everyone wants to be an employee and nobody wants to be an employer. This is interesting. Let's say there is a a r=g, to r is slightl…
-
comment
Comment #14314171
Don't know of any public, this is an interesting list of private (you're likely already aware of) https://baremetrics.com/open In working with public company CFO's, I would guess 5…
-
comment
Comment #13928900
it was only after your comment that I'm noticing: talking, listening, understanding, seeing and remembering. I wonder if we're just too focused on doing things that people do.
-
comment
Comment #13875288
Ahh interesting. I like the subscription model from the perspective of the business. Seems like it would prohibit signing up for the low-volume user though, right?