Viewing profile — lsanger
lsanger
HN member- Joined
- Sat, Nov 22, 2014, 8:36 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 192
- Public activity
- 36 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About lsanger
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #31019130
So Wikipedia doesn't accept crypto anymore. Who cares? They don't need it! The Knowledge Standards Foundation does. We're making an open network of all the encyclopedias ( http://e…
-
comment
Comment #28707870
I'm not "working on a decentralized encyclopedia." I am working on tools and standards to network together all the encyclopedias in the world. See encyclosphere.org.
-
comment
Comment #25336961
Grandma is never going to install a password manager. That's your job, geek. Besides, it's a great, unique, valuable Christmas present!
- story
-
story
Tell HN: Social media strike proposed for July 4-5 by Wikipedia co-founder
"Humanity has been contemptuously used by vast digital empires," says my new "Declaration of Digital Independence" ( https://larrysanger.org/2019/06/declaration-of-digital-indep...…
- story
-
comment
Comment #18955599
Oy, you really did not understand why I moved, even though I explained it quite clearly.
-
comment
Comment #18955578
> Well it doesn't help that Linux desktop is backed by one of the most condescending cultures that ever stalked the internet. Ouch.
-
comment
Comment #18955566
Apple wants to store your data in iCloud--I don't wanna. I don't trust them. Apple is happy to learn a lot about you. Hence the feds can learn a lot about you through them. But mos…
-
comment
Comment #18955541
Good point. My support person was my 12-year-old son. ;-)
-
comment
Comment #18955523
Did I suggest that people follow my precise route? I'm not sure I did. I was just reporting how I did it.
-
comment
Comment #18955515
It's not meant to win over an average Joe. It's meant to maybe win over the sort of people who read my blog--technical or semi-technical, intelligent in any case, capable of thinki…
-
comment
Comment #18955512
I'm not, really. Before they moved to the crowd (I refused to follow them there), I used to be an Office expert. I knew the software inside and out. I still use Word 2007. But no, …
-
comment
Comment #18955494
I didn't even know that was running. I'm going to remove it.
-
comment
Comment #18955417
Author of the article here. I just noticed that it had been posted on Hacker News. Thanks to se7entime!
-
comment
Comment #8649050
Ever since I heard of this site, I've thought that (annotating the web, or parts of the web) is a great idea for a website, and they're executing it pretty well. It's not what we'r…
-
comment
Comment #8649033
In the wonderful event that Infobitt becomes a superior product and accordingly gains market share to the detriment of news sources, then we will of course know where our bread is …
-
comment
Comment #8649020
This is a good idea. We need to code the "like" feature as the first step to implementing this.
-
comment
Comment #8648988
It's certainly something we can consider now that we've soft-launched. We've thought about it in the past, and now I guess it is a good idea to consider it again!
-
comment
Comment #8648983
Battling organized partisanship is a problem for down the road. My hope is that, by the time we deal with that, we'll have the funding and the personnel to code up a system that en…
-
comment
Comment #8648979
The fact that bitt and fact order, as well as which fact is displayed to the reader, is (or will soon be) subject to vote will provide a moderating influence, I hope. The reason Wi…
-
comment
Comment #8648959
I actually agree. This is one area in which Wikipedia shines. But when it comes to breaking news, or tracking the actual order of events as they were reported, not so much.
-
comment
Comment #8647647
As I have said several times before, Wikipedia doesn't follow Surowiecki's rules for "wisdom of crowds" effects. The Infobitt model has an advantage over wikis that will enable a w…
-
comment
Comment #8647627
Yes, may the best model win!
-
comment
Comment #8647621
Yes, agreed. There are some issues (mostly having to do with scalability) we have to sort out before we launch to public view without login.