Viewing profile — lpolovets
lpolovets
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Apr 17, 2009, 5:15 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 5,627
- Public activity
- 891 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About lpolovets
Before becoming a VC, I spent a decade as a software engineer. I was the 2nd non-founding engineer at LinkedIn, then worked on Google's internal payment fraud detection team, then was an early engineer at Factual.
Very active Twitter: https://twitter.com/lpolovets
Very inactive Blog: http://codingvc.com
Email address is in my blog's header.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #48710857
IANAL so maybe I'm not reading it correctly, but my understanding of the bill ( https://legislature.mi.gov/documents/2025-2026/billintroduce... ) is that you have to compensate for…
-
comment
Comment #48710329
I think stuff like this is much better settled with compensation than legislation. For example when I was an engineer 15-20 years ago, my friends would deprioritize jobs with lots …
- story
-
comment
Comment #48375472
Related to this, I hate how aggressively Google pushes Gemini and all of the privacy implications involved with that. 1) Lots of features got moved around and there are now many "W…
-
comment
Comment #48165990
It's sobering to think that if every single person in Malta -- an entire country! -- signed up for ChatGPT and used it weekly, ChatGPT’s WAU would increase by only a few tenths of …
- story
-
comment
Comment #45393512
A cool approach to digitizing touch that I read about a few days ago: https://www.wired.com/story/this-clever-robotic-finger-feels... (I'm not disagreeing with the author, just sha…
-
comment
Comment #44487313
This is secondhand and not firsthand knowledge, but one thing I've heard from a number of agtech founders (and sometimes farmers when we do diligence calls with them) is that hirin…
- story
- story
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #43836983
This feels premature -- we've only had great AI capabilities for a little while, and jobs are not replaced overnight. This reminds me of some early stage startup pitches. During a …
- story
-
comment
Comment #42782891
Not quite the same, but this reminds me of bitcoin, where miners are on the hunt for SHA hashes that start with a bunch of zeroes in a row (which one could say is memorable/unusual…
-
comment
Comment #42532948
I think incentives are different on an individual level. Yes, if everyone built more housing then your property's value would not go up as much. But if a single individual builds h…
- story
-
comment
Comment #40816392
My understanding is this allergen over-labeling was inspired by the FDA in the first place. https://www.fastcompany.com/90830854/sesame-seed-allergen-fd... From the linked article …
-
comment
Comment #40675496
> "This large gap isn’t particularly surprising, given that San Francisco has the highest density of billionaires of any city in the world, with Silicon Valley known for its absurd…
- story
-
comment
Comment #39607564
It's "mostly" equity. If a company doesn't exit for anything it's not on the hook for the VC $, there are no monthly interest payments, etc. OTOH if there's a great exit that clear…
-
comment
Comment #39606203
I've thought about that kind of system before, and it's an interesting approach but it doesn't fully protect against bad actors. E.g. what if the founder raises $5m, puts it into a…
-
comment
Comment #39604514
I'll throw out a VC's perspective on liquidation prefs: 1) I think 1x is very fair and meant to protect investors from bad company behavior. If you didn't have 1x preference, this …
-
comment
Comment #38784302
Three episodes that I really enjoyed (from an engineer-turned-investor's POV): https://podcasts.apple.com/dk/podcast/palmer-luckey-inventin... (Palmer Luckey) https://podcasts.appl…
-
comment
Comment #38721235
It's not clear to me that the title of the post is the logical conclusion from the post's content. The post talks about fewer investors in VC rounds, but the definition of an inves…