Viewing profile — lpage
lpage
HN member- Joined
- Tue, Apr 30, 2013, 12:39 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 1,740
- Public activity
- 180 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About lpage
You can e-mail me at: echo "a2VsbHkubGl0dGxlcGFnZUBnbWFpbC5jb20K" | base64 --decode
[ my public key: https://keybase.io/klittlepage; my proof: https://keybase.io/klittlepage/sigs/rwf5jZM7Wj6iCWAfmRwBOcpf6yhp9-doldqP31CVOiA ]
YC Badge: 0x749c80964Ba6Ed43dC2c9ae4f14cD597795E72c3
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #48865381
WFQueue isn't handing out &T, so Send is sufficient: unsafe impl Sync for WFQueue {} unsafe impl Send for WFQueue {}
- story
-
comment
Comment #45390503
https://archive.is/mGsFm
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #42443472
As an auction theorist who's biased towards putting things in auctions and as an operator who's been through the venture investment process several times, I'm biased in wanting a m…
-
comment
Comment #39241468
Your mention of Futamura Projections was a nice reminder of how very mathy/theoretical foundations underpin Nice Things in high-level languages, like Hindley–Milner inspired type s…
-
comment
Comment #37370718
Maelstrom [1], a workbench for learning distributed systems from the creator of Jepsen, includes a simple (model-checked) implementation of Raft and an excellent tutorial on implem…
-
comment
Comment #36524656
This thread [1] covering the 2020 Prize in Economic Sciences, awarded to Paul Milgrom and Bob Wilson for their improvement of auction theory, is a good read. Vickery Auctions are o…
-
comment
Comment #33894775
Joshua Bloch did a great post [1] on how nearly all standard library binary searches and mergesorts were broken (as of 2006) due to this exact issue. The punchline is that the bugs…
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #32481900
Imandra [1] has an excellent literate programming walkthrough that hits on the same issues and plugs the holes one by one using formal methods, ultimately proving merge sort correc…
-
comment
Comment #31191498
The source itself is commercial AGPL v3.0. I'm guessing that this was an accident so I opened https://github.com/quickwit-oss/chitchat/issues/42 to clarify.
-
comment
Comment #30269245
> let's say hypothetically you create a market for "+100 FB shares, -500 SNAP shares". If everyone is competing on price to quote that combination, that creates the most competitiv…
-
comment
Comment #30268786
> Congrats on the launch! What are the main benefits of this approach compared to creating additional combo (multi-leg) products on existing exchanges? Thanks! There are two main d…
-
comment
Comment #30264701
> Are you expecting to only support institutional investors or retail order flow as well? We don't segment the market at all or exclude subscribers (beyond requiring that they're F…
-
comment
Comment #30259230
Thanks! We found that the "UX" aspect of fitting squarely into existing workflows to disrupt without disrupting is key—as is how we message the product. Both our focus on solving s…
-
comment
Comment #30257620
This is a significant tailwind for the next wave of electronification that we're hoping to advance. US swap dealers, for example, now have a SEF reporting requirement, but most of …
-
comment
Comment #30257586
> How do you deal with best execution obligations for the "legs" of your trades? Excellent question. Each leg of the trade comes in as an individual limit order with a price/quanti…
-
comment
Comment #30255174
Thanks! We're quite fortunate in that we always knew roughly where we needed to get to from a technical, business, and regulatory standpoint, so actually getting there was just a l…
-
comment
Comment #30254900
Thanks! I'll say that a key design goal of ours is to make it so that PMs/asset managers/execution traders running complex books don't have to think about microstructure. Today's m…
-
comment
Comment #30254867
Anything involving the phrase "better price" is a regulatory sensitivity, so please forgive the specificity of this answer. It's possible but not guaranteed that both the buyer and…
-
comment
Comment #30254735
Thanks, and with you 100%. That's why we've invested heavily in a more technically challenging for us but better for the end-user approach to Expressive Bidding. It's also worth no…
-
comment
Comment #30253945
To clarify, 1T isn't what we're claiming as our revenue opportunity; it's what traders are missing out on annually in the form of portfolio returns due to market friction and misse…