Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — loverofhumanz

loverofhumanz

HN member
Joined
Wed, Sep 17, 2025, 6:02 PM UTC
HN karma
78
Public activity
29 items

About loverofhumanz

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
  2. comment
  3. comment
    Comment #45765890

    [flagged]

  4. comment
    Comment #45765670

    [flagged]

  5. comment
  6. comment
    Comment #45765332

    [flagged]

  7. comment
    Comment #45735139

    Man suffered outdoors very much, for a million years. Man want both good of indoors and good of out outdoors.

  8. comment
    Comment #45552326

    > That giving the state security apparatus more tools to arbitrarily harass people at their discretion is a Bad Idea™. Measuring heart rate, using a computer which can log its data…

  9. comment
    Comment #45552255

    Some of the responses to me were rude and I calibrated my responses to them appropriately. You stated I was "missing the point" which is more rude than me sincerely asking you to e…

  10. comment
    Comment #45550569

    Yes, some people will be stressed and nervous for benign reasons. Criminals will also be stressed and nervous. A good security system will use multiple signals to filter out false-…

  11. comment
    Comment #45550490

    Explain how it's worse than a camera or thermal camera that detects you sweating? Explain how it increases the incentive to do body cavity searches?

  12. comment
    Comment #45550485

    > Today you’re among the people to avoid searching; tomorrow, well… maybe you’ll have a reason to be nervous. What do you even mean here? Seems entirely incoherent.

  13. comment
    Comment #45550480

    > Please supply your dna and biometrics at every entry point of a public roadways. Thank you good citizen. Hysterical slipper slope nonsense. Using RF to passively detect someone's…

  14. comment
    Comment #45550424

    "Of course there would be many false positives, so it wouldn't be good enough on its own."

  15. comment
    Comment #45550415

    "Of course there would be many false positives, so it wouldn't be good enough on its own."

  16. comment
    Comment #45550384

    > Oh good lord. Now it's no longer even "have you read a history book on the 20th century?" anymore, it's "have you been paying attention to the world for the past 15 years?". Spar…

  17. comment
    Comment #45545221

    Doesn't seem like a reasonable objection to me. It takes a lot of time and man power to search people's body cavities. The incentive is to avoid searching as many people as possibl…

  18. comment
    Comment #45545215

    Wifi seems much more capable and harder to defeat? A heavy coat could defeat mmWave, I believe.

  19. comment
    Comment #45545122

    What's the objection? I don't see how having my heart rate scanned at an airport or military checkpoint in any way impinges on my freedom or happiness.

  20. comment
    Comment #45545105

    It could be used to scan people's heart rates when they're in a high security line (military check points, airports, embassies) to detect people who are nervous. I assume some plac…

  21. comment
    Comment #45543537

    I used the AI, the web, and even tried to verify with full page scans but then I realized I have a job.

  22. comment
    Comment #45542866

    In the oldest reliable references from the 1920s, it was a $2 bill, $1 bill, a watch, and a dime. So keys and contacts are both modern revisions.

  23. comment
    Comment #45540741

    Depends largely on the altitude when fuel runs out. If it runs out when they're at 4,000 ft and it's windy, it's probably game over.

  24. comment
    Comment #45540681

    "I’m a little confused by what there is to investigate at all." You're confused why they should investigate how everyone on that flight came within minutes of dying? Something abou…

  25. comment