Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — lotsoflumens

lotsoflumens

HN member
Joined
Thu, Sep 24, 2015, 4:42 PM UTC
HN karma
180
Public activity
131 items

About lotsoflumens

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #15398267

    I used to worry about this. Now I realise that my worry came from a scarcity mindset. There is no reason at all to believe that electricity production will always be difficult or e…

  2. comment
    Comment #15252870

    >>> That is, you could recover the unencrypted data if you recorded a copy of the pilot by mixing. Yes, thanks for the response!

  3. comment
    Comment #15249293

    Since backscatter systems depend on on an RF source, I wonder if work has been done on encrypting the source signal (pseudorandom bit pattern for example), then modulating the rand…

  4. comment
    Comment #15234010

    I think it's just very subtle sarcasm that these are dangerous thoughts in a world where thought-crime is real.

  5. comment
    Comment #15233966

    I just love it that everyone is saying things like: "And yes, it is my opinion that climate change is absolutely happening" . The level of fear in stating simple opinions has gone …

  6. comment
    Comment #15233830

    You should review the concept of "fractional reserve banking".

  7. comment
    Comment #15209236

    Still relevant but apparently unknown to the trendy conference speakers and FP ranters: http://www.cs.toronto.edu/~hehner/aPToP/

  8. comment
    Comment #15172376

    You're missing the entire fields of robotics and automatic control, which are not new fields and have never made claims of human level intelligence. These are the fields that have …

  9. comment
    Comment #14994682

    Well then, I guess with that line of reasoning we should just turn off the computers and go live in the woods. There's obviously too much risk in doing anything.

  10. comment
    Comment #14992065

    In most large companies today, the shareholders outside of the top 3 management levels are irrelevant and usually just a tedious burden.

  11. comment
    Comment #14991068

    Thanks, but that means I'm doing the testing. I wish I could do that - maybe someday.

  12. comment
    Comment #14989844

    It's important for package developers to be aware of other software that depends on their interfaces or functionality. Some cases will slip through sometimes, but over a couple of …

  13. comment
    Comment #14989701

    I've seen that bug! And, I'm not too surprised, KDE has a broken development and maintenance process. I'm sure they think they're doing a great job - but that's because they don't …

  14. comment
    Comment #14989517

    I agree, this is a problem, but it's not being solved by this practice. The example you gave is specifically about a client application of git that wasn't updated to work with the …

  15. comment
    Comment #14989385

    Yes, it makes a lot of sense to ignore the real world and pretend that software will always be stable.

  16. comment
    Comment #14989303

    This practice is seriously bad. It means that one group of developers is busy improving and fixing packages, and another different group is cherry-picking commits in order to maint…

  17. comment
    Comment #14989175

    Thanks so much for pointing to this.

  18. comment
    Comment #14989135

    Thanks for the info! I've added the git-core PPA now which installs 2.14.1 . I just don't understand this screwing with version numbers and not being on the latest code.

  19. comment
    Comment #14988973

    Does anybody understand Ubuntu releases? The update this morning for Ubuntu 17.04 installs git 2.11.0 .. NOT the patched 2.11.3 NOR the latest 2.14.1 Why isn't Ubuntu fully up to d…

  20. comment
    Comment #14939482

    I assume they are .. however, they take no risks with their shaming.

  21. comment
    Comment #14939420

    Of course it's mandatory ... unless you don't care about silly little things like bonuses and promotions.

  22. comment
    Comment #14939190

    TL;DR Some guy not only speaks his mind, but has the balls to actually write his thoughts down. The completely predictable response from "forward thinking progressives" follows.

  23. comment
    Comment #14923516

    Yes. This so correct. Linting efficacy is one of the many myths about software quality and team efficiency that abound in this industry.

  24. comment
    Comment #14910725

    Citing an arXiv paper should take precedence over citing anything else. If you really believe in science then ONLY non-paywall papers should be cited.

  25. comment
    Comment #14910184

    It's called Finite Domain Constraint Programming and it's been studied for about 50 years.