Viewing profile — loopholelabs
loopholelabs
HN member- Joined
- Tue, Apr 28, 2020, 5:21 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 172
- Public activity
- 24 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About loopholelabs
Recent public activity
- story
-
comment
Comment #43055418
I think time-slicing for GPUs is likely the solution here. If you could checkpoint a GPU quickly enough it would be possible to run multiple isolated workloads on the same GPUs wit…
- comment
- story
-
comment
Comment #32617117
Hey everyone, Founder of Loophole Labs here! The team and I are happy to answer any questions you might have about fRPC, Frisbee, or Loophole in general! We wrote fRPC because we r…
-
story
Show HN: FRPC – A Faster, More Flexible RPC Framework
Today we're announcing frpc-go, an RPC framework that's designed from the ground up to be lightweight, extensible, and extremely performant. In an apples-to-apples comparison fRPC …
- story
-
comment
Comment #24792507
Hi! Author of this library here, I'm happy to answer any questions about this.
-
comment
Comment #23029271
We'll be releasing an update soon that will enable both custom domains (so you can bring your own) and reservable subdomains. Furthermore we plan on releasing a self-hosted version…
-
comment
Comment #23029263
I've written up an in-depth analysis here: https://medium.com/@shivanshvij/building-a-better-ngrok-dbc1...
-
comment
Comment #23024870
That makes a lot of sense, thanks for pointing this out! I assumed that asking people to verify their emails would be enough but it never hurts to make things clear. I'll make thos…
-
comment
Comment #23024810
HTTP will compress traffic from the lynk endpoint but we also compress the traffic from the client to that endpoint which helps save bandwidth and keeps things snappy even in slow …
-
comment
Comment #23023850
Would you be able to discuss this bug with us? We're in Beta right now and are looking to document and squash as many bugs as possible. Please email us at lynk@loopholelabs.io
-
comment
Comment #23023836
Yes, it was and this has since been removed.
-
comment
Comment #23023821
Hi! I've written an analysis of Lynk's performance vs. Ngrok here: https://medium.com/@shivanshvij/building-a-better-ngrok-dbc1... and our documentation stating "SHA-256 Encryption…
-
comment
Comment #23023801
This was a mistake on our website, which as since been removed. 1. We'll be open sourcing our client in the coming weeks so you can check out our code yourselves. 2. We will be off…
-
comment
Comment #23023700
I should have been more clear. The client compresses responses from your local services before they're encrypted and sent to the Lynk infrastructure. This application is designed p…
-
comment
Comment #23023624
That's in the works as well, we're just looking into how we can properly tie these tunnels to your Lynk account
-
comment
Comment #23023614
We'll be releasing a self-hosted server and client soon that will allow you to decouple completely from our infrastructure and bring your own SSL certificates. However, to be clear…
-
comment
Comment #23023189
Yes, we are doing E2E encryption and compression between the Lynk Infrastructure and Lynk Clients. As with Ngrok, for a quick hosted tunnel our encryption will be more than suitabl…
-
comment
Comment #23022614
Hi Hackernews, We're excited to announce that the Lynk Beta is now live! We've been hard at work building out Lynk's tunnelling protocols to make them faster, more stable, and all …
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #23009364
We completely agree, and a big focus for us has been improving the UX compared to Ngrok. Our docs are being overhauled this week and will include examples on hosting common apps, t…