Viewing profile — lomnakkus
lomnakkus
HN member- Joined
- Sat, Dec 07, 2013, 6:29 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 2,153
- Public activity
- 1,359 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About lomnakkus
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #42449821
In a former life I worked with a codebase that used that style. Let's just say it isn't enough.
-
comment
Comment #42449161
No, but you can easily end up missing some because somebody wrapped them in some sub-type of RuntimeException because they were forced(!) to. This happens all the time because the …
-
comment
Comment #21090189
Parent poster explicitly said "under pressure". What more do you want?
-
comment
Comment #19387350
> Copying is encouraged. Like I said, having the algorithm there is a good way to make it apparent what the code is actually going to do and the associated cost of the solution. It…
-
comment
Comment #18663351
Present tense -- it's (almost?) always a little shorter, so you can fit more information into the "subject" line.
-
comment
Comment #17875335
Using min() seems like it could be incredibly dangerous as an "implicit" behavior, not to mention surprising. I'd wager it'd be much better to just specify that abort() gets called…
-
comment
Comment #17830313
> IMO Lambda calculus should be taught wider in CS programs. It brings useful models, builds (if one likes theory) good background to functional programming paradigms, etc. I'm sur…
-
comment
Comment #17830193
Honestly, it seems like a pretty clear intention to co-opt a term ("commons") which has usually meant "let's share things!" to mean something entirely different. (And shame on them…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #17830122
I believe it may be because the email only mentioned Intel explicitly and had a "I won't be buying Intel in future" (paraphrased) comment. However, I personally wouldn't assume tha…
-
comment
Comment #17829860
If I were being pithy, I find that when you're doing this type of thing it's more a feeling of "working fun" rather than "working hard". (Of course this means that one is probably …
-
comment
Comment #17805015
I think you mean the "biosphere" rather than "we". Modern humans have existed anywhere from 50k-200k years. Just to put the time scales into context. EDIT: Just to clarify: As long…
-
comment
Comment #17803027
If the array structure itself were being modified, the "i < a.length" check would have to be done every iteration, but in this case there's no mutation of the array itself, so it's…
-
comment
Comment #17760288
I suppose that's true in some sense, but at least string theorist have done some interesting math? (It may not be math that applies to the real world, but math being math is eterna…
-
comment
Comment #17741058
Damage-by-software usually isn't spectacular (and therefore not likely to get noticed) or not necessarily very directly costly in terms of human lives, but I'd argue it's actually …
-
comment
Comment #17740520
Um, mix in a second randomly-chosen UUID? My point wasn't so much that I had the perfect solution and that I'd thought of everything. It's that there are much better systems and th…
-
comment
Comment #17740506
I can second that recommenadation.
-
comment
Comment #17739758
Indeed. Java is in fact a sort of worst-of-all-worlds in that it's even possible to catch things that are really unrecoverable errors like StackOverflowException or OutOfMemoryErro…
-
comment
Comment #17722371
Personally, I think even having to choose a UID at install time or dynamically is a pretty sad indictment of just how broken the user system on Linux (and pretty much every UNIX-li…
-
comment
Comment #17666453
Did you read what I said at all? "Order total: undefined" is hugely different from "There was an error -- maybe just leave the page, yeah?".
-
comment
Comment #17666376
For the hard of hearing, non-native speakers who are used to subtitles from non-dubbed movies, etc. etc. I suppose. I do know that, as a non-native English speaker, I've always app…
-
comment
Comment #17666196
That seems... short-sighted. There's a huge amount of 'interesting' things one can do which are illegal, immoral, depraved and worse. (I'd argue that stealing is generally at the v…
-
comment
Comment #17654647
This has nothing to do with undefined vs. exceptions, sorry. You can do example the same with a powerful enough sandbox -- e.g. what WebAsm does to avoid hostile code taking over y…
-
comment
Comment #17651329
How is "there was a JavaScript error on this page" informational icon any worse than an order total of "undefined" or that the page just doesn't seem to be reacting to clicks? I'd …
-
comment
Comment #17651042
The JS way is a mistake, intentional or not. Here's a little thought experiment: Your program ends up with an "undefined" in some variable 'x'. How did that happen? In JS it can ha…