Viewing profile — lolinder
lolinder
HN member- Joined
- Sat, Feb 16, 2019, 12:19 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 45,529
- Public activity
- 8,487 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About lolinder
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
- comment
- comment
-
comment
Comment #48905209
Porkbun has been good to me and a lot of others.
-
comment
Comment #48902219
Dependency injection provides the same hermetic-testing capability, so that's not really an answer to OP's question. Effect-as-world-model is, in this specific way, just a special …
-
comment
Comment #48902171
You're failing to distinguish between token count spent and context window used. You're correct that the former is not a concern for Anthropic, but it's also not the problem I'm po…
-
comment
Comment #48901408
Not just effects, multi-shot effects: > Algebraic effects with deep, multi-shot handlers. A handler can resume a computation zero, one, or many times, which is what makes exhaustiv…
-
comment
Comment #48901059
Looking at the official description of a Forward Deployed Engineer I'm uncertain what even the nominal difference between this and a Solutions Architect is. Is the nominal differen…
-
comment
Comment #48898652
Depends on what you mean by better. I chose Porkbun because it's a small company with good prices, a good vibe, and all the tools that I need. Cloudflare was never going to be on t…
-
comment
Comment #48898591
I'd honestly be careful with squarespace. They are owned by private equity, advertise on countless YouTube channels, and at the same time their core market is under a looming threa…
-
comment
Comment #48898525
Their prices had already been going up for a few years before that, which finally pushed me off them starting around August of last year. I'm about to swap my final few domains ove…
-
comment
Comment #48898035
The weird twist here is that I've found that there are times where Fable is actually worse than Opus at a straightforward task, not just more expensive. It'll launch off into its o…
-
comment
Comment #48897184
This piece focuses on the cost differences from the tokenizer, which do matter, but I wish they emphasized more that even adding the tokenizer to your calculation doesn't provide y…
-
comment
Comment #48895056
Because what they did say is true for both agents and humans. Which makes it a more compelling argument than just emphasizing the specific aspect of that limitation agentic workflo…
-
comment
Comment #48893605
You realize that what you're describing is inherent complexity in memory management? This is not something that you can dodge by using Zig, it's just part of the domain. The differ…
-
comment
Comment #48893551
That's only the correct abstraction if you intended to hold off on releasing the rewrite until you were completely finished, because there's no universe where Bun of all projects r…
-
comment
Comment #48893514
The example shows three extra lines of code, two of which are `defer`s. I'm not an expert in Zig and can't tell you whether the example they give is contrived, but the claim they'r…
-
comment
Comment #48893472
Because if you have to quadruple the number of tokens in your code base in order to make the Zig provably safe, you have 1/4 of the context window to do useful work.
-
comment
Comment #48892798
No one's obliged to respond to hearsay by trying to guess what the other party might have misheard to arrive at a false conclusion. It's enough to demonstrate that the conclusion t…
-
comment
Comment #48892765
If that's what he meant that doesn't speak well for his communication in this post, because "the Bun team told us that they were not fuzzing anything" is a wildly different claim t…
-
comment
Comment #48892485
The very next sentence justifies why they didn't do it: it argues that they would have ended up with what was technically Zig but something that was much less ergonomic than what w…
-
comment
Comment #48892295
If the end state were unsafe Rust, you'd be right, but that's explicitly not the intended end state. Unsafe Rust was the reachable first step . Now they have a Rust version and can…
-
comment
Comment #48892249
> making sure the JIT doesn't emit anything broken or naughty is completely outside the scope of Rust. It's also outside the scope of the project if they're using Webkit's engine f…
-
comment
Comment #48892204
No one involved in the port proposed "blindly porting Zig code 1:1 and calling it a day". From the first blog post the creator said: > We can gradually refactor it to reduce unsafe…
- story
-
comment
Comment #48503792
The discrete number of cows being born is theoretically fine-grained enough to actually respond to 2–3 vegans yielding one fewer cow. It's unlikely on a one-year time scale, but on…