Viewing profile — loganabbott
loganabbott
HN member- Joined
- Thu, Jan 28, 2016, 11:23 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 468
- Public activity
- 152 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About loganabbott
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #31980622
Publishing wrong information is wrong.
-
comment
Comment #31940501
That is correct. We informed SF Conservancy about this but they are so far unwilling to correct it.
-
comment
Comment #31938284
SourceForge CEO here. The first paragraph of this article is wrong. SourceForge has been built on Apache Allura since 2011. https://allura.apache.org
-
comment
Comment #20752787
Most people have gotten the message that things have changed at SourceForge. We bought it to redeem the name and protect free open source software.
-
comment
Comment #20750707
We're a small independently owned private company, and not a single person responsible for those decisions made years ago is still involved with the company. It's been over 3 years…
-
comment
Comment #20750675
SourceForge still supports Mercurial https://sourceforge.net/p/forge/documentation/Mercurial/#pub...
-
comment
Comment #17596119
Nope it's still free and has always been free. And it's built on Apache Allura which is open source.
-
comment
Comment #17593441
Huh? Still completely free
-
comment
Comment #17592523
Hi, president of SourceForge here. Glad this is trending, albeit a few months later. These articles seem to trend on HN every few months, with many people not realizing SourceForge…
-
comment
Comment #17384082
We lost a few hours of commits and notified everyone affected. That's it.
-
comment
Comment #17382640
FYI the SourceForge version of FileZilla is clean, and has been since 2016. The official FileZilla installer has been doing this for some time now though. In case people don’t know…
-
comment
Comment #17382544
This blog post is not accurate at all.
-
comment
Comment #17382052
FYI the SourceForge version of FileZilla is clean, and has been since 2016. The official FileZilla installer has been doing this for some time now though. In case people don’t know…
-
comment
Comment #17284445
Thanks for the input. I am not trying to be insulting to anyone here. If it came off that way, I apologize. I am just, maybe too frustratingly, trying to get the point across that …
-
comment
Comment #17284433
My point was not to be insulting, it was to draw attention to the fact that I don't know this person, just like most people don't know what's going on behind the scenes at SourceFo…
-
comment
Comment #17284361
Sorry if my comments rubbed you the wrong way, but it's a bit frustrating when these threads pop up weekly, and people feel like it's open license to attack me and my company. We r…
-
comment
Comment #17284327
Well I do appreciate the feedback and valid questions. I will be putting some thought into it.
-
comment
Comment #17282035
I'm not frustrated, but these threads show up on HN almost weekly now, with armchair quarterbacks who really are not current on the state of open source opining ill informed opinio…
-
comment
Comment #17282015
Ahhh logic and reason. Feels like drinking a cold coca cola in the hot sun. Thank you.
-
comment
Comment #17281990
Thanks. I appreciate it.
-
comment
Comment #17281987
I don't think "attacking" means what you think it means. Why do you keep posting the same comment over and over?
-
comment
Comment #17281980
Man, the definition of the word "attack" has really changed recently.
-
comment
Comment #17281901
Our agenda was removing bundled adware and improving user experience. Mystery solved.
-
comment
Comment #17281879
Thanks. Yep we killed the bundled adware and fake download buttons on DAY ONE. Nice to hear that at least some people understand that.
-
comment
Comment #17281868
Thank you for being reasonable