Viewing profile — lo_zamoyski
lo_zamoyski
HN member- Joined
- Thu, Sep 01, 2022, 3:44 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 1,985
- Public activity
- 1,874 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About lo_zamoyski
--
"The most important things about beliefs are whether they are true. The most important thing about motives is whether they are good. But motives don’t tell us whether beliefs are true." ― J. Budziszewski
And beliefs don't tell us whether motives are good.
--
Being "nice" is not the same as being "good". Nice people are often some of the worst specimens.
--
When a good and true comment is downvoted, it is actually the downvoter who is demoting himself and removing himself from the kingdom of truth, turning instead toward the darkness.
--
I will, on occasion, steel-man the positions of others in the comments. I do this, because sometimes their positions are not given a fair shake. I take this to be a good act.
--
Let us just say that HN is not exactly the creme-de-la-creme.
--
Sometimes what I say is claimed to be obvious. But this is no defect. Indeed, the fault of the interlocutor is that he fails to draw out the implications of the obvious, hence the reminder of the obvious.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49211661
> There is no single effect of AI on work quality. Depends on use and effort. Quoting the article... "Nearly half of senior leaders say they would trust a chatbot’s judgment over t…
-
comment
Comment #49198806
I didn't say being phony is a benefit. I was (in my view) charitably giving the author the benefit of the doubt by assuming that his vulgarity is feigned (posturing) and not ingrai…
-
comment
Comment #49198726
Thanks for your response. > I didn’t make that claim in any implied way, I asserted, correctly, that Aristotle is not an Abrahamic thinker. I was trying to make sense of what your …
-
comment
Comment #49195846
What an obnoxious post. Pro-tip: knock off the vulgarity and avoid making ignorant remarks that pander to presently fashionable sentiments. It doesn't "spice up" your text or make …
-
comment
Comment #49191358
> How can we possibly make use of these breakthroughs if we don’t understand them? How could we ever make anything useful with them? Theoretical science isn't about usefulness per …
-
comment
Comment #49191301
It's a category mistake. People try to naturalize Jesus as a "great teacher", but the one thing you cannot do is frame Jesus as another wise man and good teacher! The man claimed t…
-
comment
Comment #49191244
[dead]
-
comment
Comment #49191219
I have no idea what you're trying to say here. Those two sentences seem disconnected. One very common error people make is to believe that ethics - at least epistemically and for t…
-
comment
Comment #49182529
For one, because it's an indicator of health and healthy development, which are in turn related to other desirable features. Analogous things can be said for women. You also can't …
-
comment
Comment #49129118
> now I drink 1 cup of coffee and, if I'm feeling wild, I'll occasionally get an espresso. FYI, unless we're talking double espresso, a typical shot of espresso contains less caffe…
-
comment
Comment #49028529
You may dislike buying used books like that, but the purpose of the previous owner wasn't to satisfy your future desire for a pristine copy. The purpose was his own knowledge. If t…
-
comment
Comment #49010799
I appreciate that this is a topic of discussion, whatever defects the author's post contains, both explicit and tacit. Some commentary: 1. Ethics is the practical science (in the b…
-
comment
Comment #49005103
The trouble is that the definition of "castle" varies considerably between countries. For instance, the German classification divides them into "Schloss" and "Burg", but these can …
-
comment
Comment #48981493
Perfection is always relative to a purpose or telos . So in the case of artifacts - which are the products of engineering, arts, and techne in general - the purpose isn't inherent …
-
comment
Comment #48977859
> why did you hire these morons? The democratic process is the selection of incompetent people by unqualified people.
-
comment
Comment #48957559
A good question to pose to Sam.
-
comment
Comment #48957553
Interesting Rorschach test.
-
comment
Comment #48906519
The very consumerism that has made it materially wealthy has fucked up its citizens' priorities. Indeed, because the wealth differential over the last 30 years is as steep as it is…
-
comment
Comment #48906388
Not really. You can be honest about something working and others can disagree with your assessment.
-
comment
Comment #48865457
I'd have to look deeper into his views, but I've already come across what seem like similar claims that try to attribute computation to the laws of physics or to matter in general …
-
comment
Comment #48861561
Whatever one might say about method, epistemically speaking, the aesthetic is prior to the mathematical. The mathematical is found in the analysis of the beautiful.
-
comment
Comment #48861473
> I love how artistic taste can be partially derived from math [...] the math itself isn't sufficient to develop artistic taste Strictly speaking, it isn't "math" as math is the sc…
-
comment
Comment #48851447
And if we're talking Ukraine, we have to talk Poland as it has been facilitating 90% of all Western military equipment, humanitarian aid, and crucial trade deliveries into the coun…
-
comment
Comment #48761376
The "man-o-sphere" is pornographic. Look at the porn-brained Tate brothers for an example. That is their whole ethos and their souls are rotted out by it. Both are based in dehuman…
-
comment
Comment #48751273
> Science can't disprove religion. That depends on which religion, doesn't it. The categorical claim doesn't make any sense, because the general notion of "religion" doesn't entail…