Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — llmslave2

llmslave2

HN member
Joined
Thu, Dec 18, 2025, 8:03 PM UTC
HN karma
1,096
Public activity
356 items

About llmslave2

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #46559230

    [flagged]

  2. comment
    Comment #46559018

    > while a different set of skills are improving (the skill of getting an LLM to produce functional output Lmaooooo

  3. comment
    Comment #46558939

    Yep. I'd say it's an order of magnitude more effort to read code you haven't written too, compared to reading code you wrote. So there is approximately zero chance the people using…

  4. comment
    Comment #46558920

    I actually don't think they would agree with most of this. Why would you think that?

  5. comment
  6. comment
    Comment #46558815

    Good news: the evidence points to it being slower than non-ai workflows. So we're destroying our economy, society, and planet to make worse software, more slowly! :)

  7. comment
    Comment #46558802

    I thought the article was going to be about AI zealotry but it was just AI zealotry.

  8. comment
    Comment #46552234

    ensloppification

  9. comment
    Comment #46552198

    [flagged]

  10. comment
    Comment #46552172

    Anthropic developers run 10 Claude Code instances at once, with unlimited access to the best models.

  11. comment
    Comment #46552155

    [flagged]

  12. comment
    Comment #46552112

    [flagged]

  13. comment
    Comment #46551182

    I'm sorry but I'm not going to take "research" about Claude seriously from Anthropic, the company who makes and sells Claude. I'm also not going to do that for Copilot from Microso…

  14. comment
    Comment #46551176

    But useful in the context of these debates isn't that it solves any single problem for someone. Nobody is arguing that LLM's have zero utility. So I don't really see what your poin…

  15. comment
    Comment #46551152

    Yeah this is the key point. Part of me wonders if it's just 0.1x devs somehow reaching 1.0x productivity...

  16. comment
    Comment #46551140

    [flagged]

  17. comment
  18. comment
    Comment #46549396

    more code = better software

  19. comment
    Comment #46549347

    I've seen some interesting work going the other way, having LLMs generate constraint solvers (or whatever the term is) in prolog and then feeding input to that. I can't remember th…

  20. comment
    Comment #46549237

    They're all marketing slop lol. Go look at their methodology. Absolutely shite.

  21. comment
    Comment #46549094

    I actually prefer no syntax highlighting, and I certainly wouldn't make any claims about it being useful. But something being "useful" is often personal - I find IDEs useful, other…

  22. comment
    Comment #46548840

    Theo is the type of programmer where you don't care when he boos you, because you know what makes him cheer.

  23. comment
    Comment #46548812

    Do you just believe everything everybody says? No quantifiable data required, as long as someone somewhere says it it must be true? One of the reasons software is in decline is bec…

  24. comment
    Comment #46548718

    If you point a spectrometer at the sky during the day in non-cloudy conditions you will observe readings peaking in the roughly 450-495 nanometers range, which crazily enough, is t…

  25. comment
    Comment #46548534

    Paste this conversation into ChatGPT and have it explain what I said because I just can't be arsed to correct you any longer.