Viewing profile — llmfan

OK, I'll ask. DeepSeek R1 gets it right: > The species formerly known as Brachiosaurus brancai was reassigned to its own genus, *Giraffatitan*, through a series of taxonomic revisi…

[flagged]

actually, a more practical idea would just be a generic "pandemic risk" site.

Seems too narrow to be a website. Maybe a site where you get overviews like this... to a prompt. "Make me a dashboard on the current Moon race. And one on Taiwan invsaion. And one …

If an AI agent understands you (and book writing, and the topic of the book) well enough then it should be able to write you a pretty nice bespoke book. I do suspect that interacti…

I mean, obviously it's a numbers game. There are only so many hackers, but there are a lot of Ivy League people and FANG people. So YC chose to open their gates. Whether this will …

I can tell just from looking at most recent YC founders that they're not hackers. I could be wrong of course. I'm probably wrong. Maybe these people who are attractive, care about …

LLMs are already better than books for exploring some ideas. But in conversation form. Until we get better versions of o1 that can generate insights over days and then communicate …

Doesn't Microsoft have a decent amount of ownership in some aspect of OpenAI's labyrinthine structure? Take Anthropic for a more legible example: Amazon and Google both gladly boug…

I think this is one of those "controversial" topics where we're meant to be particularly careful to make substantial comments.

You can judge them to be not a generally super-trustworthy brand. But I would grant them that their responsibility for the deaths of these people is limited.

https://hub.scroll.pub/onlybreck/

That was the intention behind my comment! No need to thank me tho.

hnews tries to say one positive thing challenge impossible i always love any idea for curating high iq internet community

yeah was disappointing intersection between AI and sex and relationships is very interesting and important

Current models are very cheap. Like GPT-4 cost ~$40 million to train, right? Once we get 100 billion dollar models I suppose it'll be different.

I mean, consistent mediocre releases is exactly what we have gotten out of OpenAI. But we know they started training Orion in ~May. We know it takes months to train a frontier mode…

"just a regular LLM except [trained on very different data]." I'm not saying there's some big moat, anyone can read https://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.20050 , but not all synthetic data is…

Doesn't that just depend on what LLM you happen to be using? And doesn't Perplexity support many different LLMs?

An option to side-by-side comparison could be cool

So many different areas of knowledge can be leveraged, as long as you're able to experiment and learn.

It should be called prompt science.

The article is literally presenting the case that crypto is ALL a scam (emphasis not mine). Obviously not true, and attempt at logical argumentation in article is painful.