Viewing profile — lliamander
lliamander
HN member- Joined
- Sat, Jul 13, 2013, 5:12 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 4,565
- Public activity
- 2,042 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About lliamander
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #44577179
This is similar to an intuition I've had about what it means to program "algorithmically". We often draw a distinction between "algorithms" and "business logic", but fundamentally …
-
comment
Comment #43799879
I should probably clarify - I don't mean to presume to know if the judge did it, I just mean I agree with the above poster's qualifier.
-
comment
Comment #43797793
Not every case of reframing in a debate is "whataboutism". Whataboutism is where you bring up unrelated topics. In this case, looking at how we got into a messy situation in the fi…
-
comment
Comment #43797672
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #43797661
> There is no discussion to be had when the Trump admin is directly violating people's constitutional rights. And yet here you are, still talking. So long as we are continuing this…
-
comment
Comment #43797545
I've heard that accusation so frequently from people who have zero concern about the constitution, let alone even know what it says, that I honestly struggle not to laugh. I quite …
-
comment
Comment #43797475
No, you made up a hypothetical scenario that was highly sympathetic to your position. I am saying that we should not let edge cases (real or hypothetical) dictate general policy on…
-
comment
Comment #43797418
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #43797237
The right move would have been simply to not help Flores-Ruiz evade ICE.
-
comment
Comment #43797158
Anecdotally, I have heard that the most trustworthy (perhaps only trustworthy) Federal law enforcement group is the US Marshalls.
-
comment
Comment #43796889
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #43588964
> Which is why all US military clothing is mandated to be domestically produced (Berry Amendment). Cool. > But how much industrial capacity do you want to take up making clothing? …
-
comment
Comment #43588943
No, I did not. Are you actually going to engage with the arguments I have made?
-
comment
Comment #43586547
No. We don't make our own clothes because: 1. The regulatory burden on manufacturing is much higher here than foreign countries 2. Those foreign countries have a deliberate policy …
-
comment
Comment #43586482
> Do you want people operating sewing machines or (say) welders? Adequate clothing is actually a very important in war. Frostbite, sunburn, heat exhaustion, cuts and scrapes (which…
-
comment
Comment #43586397
Yes, there will still be specialization and trade in a balanced regulatory environment.
-
comment
Comment #43586376
Minimum wage is possibly the worst, most ham-fisted way of driving productivity gains. Minimum wage and similar regulations are why so many jobs have shifted overseas in the first …
-
comment
Comment #43586307
> cheaper One major reason why it is cheaper to make these clothes overseas is because we have such a stringent regulatory regime for worker and environmental protections, and usin…
-
comment
Comment #41384583
> but replacing the fundamental principles of existing licenses with new simple principles that slice the world into acceptable and unacceptable behavior in a better fashion. Feel …
-
comment
Comment #41384410
You cannot have soft enforcement of ethical norms without hard entry requirements. That soft enforcement can only be achieved in the context of high trust social groups, which exis…
-
comment
Comment #41384111
That's the thing, while there is value in investing in open source (for corporations and individuals) that value is often speculative and hard to quantify. When times are tough, pe…
-
comment
Comment #41143657
There's no 11th commandment to be nice. Look, if you didn't find it funny, you're right. But those people who found it funny were also right. Humor is a matter of taste. > It's jus…
-
comment
Comment #41133928
"Kind" is at best a context-dependent virtue. There are plenty of situations where being critical or divisive is the right thing. And even when the harshness doesn't come from the …
-
comment
Comment #40854747
> Yes, and abortion means intent, which is an aggravating factor. What is the "intent" exactly? If a young woman has been propagandized by the surrounding culture into thinking the…
-
comment
Comment #40852007
EDIT: I want to clarify something. When I say: > The best way I see to establish "good faith" is to set clear expectations about what content is allowed What I mean is that each so…