Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — lizztheblizz

lizztheblizz

HN member
Joined
Tue, May 18, 2021, 5:05 PM UTC
HN karma
50
Public activity
17 items

About lizztheblizz

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #43355913

    Hi there, PS employee here. In AWS, the instance types backing our Metal class are currently in the following families: r6id, i4i, i3en and i7ie. We're deploying across multiple cl…

  2. comment
    Comment #33427812

    Lambda was a means to an end for us here, and we're not specifically endorsing its use in _this_ way. Our goal was explicitly to test our ability to handle many parallel connection…

  3. comment
    Comment #33427563

    Article author here. I fully endorse Aaron's correction and appreciate the call-out. For context: I initially wrote this paragraph to include more flavor and history around crash r…

  4. comment
    Comment #33427292

    So, disclaimer, I am not an Amazon Billing wizard, but given that we ran the Lambdas from an isolated sub account, I can be particularly certain that I was able to filter this down…

  5. comment
    Comment #33427190

    Absolutely agreed. As others have already pointed out, there is no underlying implication of preference to this kind of application architecture. Since we do run an actual DBaaS, o…

  6. comment
    Comment #33427039

    Article author here, interesting question! We didn't run into that issue, explicitly. Our setup was effectively as follows: - AWS Lambda functions being spawned in us-east-1, from …

  7. comment
    Comment #27203608

    I don't have nearly the experience in Postgres environments to have seen the same level of real-world impact there, but a quick search presents me with the following documentation,…

  8. comment
    Comment #27203559

    Depends. Have any examples of "normal" sharded MySQL databases? EDIT: To clarify, sharding is not a standard feature included in Community Edition MySQL. Over the years, there have…

  9. comment
    Comment #27202976

    Give it a shot, because the current implementation specifically side steps the need for that full copy, and does let you test functionally against fully up-to-date production data.…

  10. comment
    Comment #27202914

    12+ years of massive scale production use for Vitess and 26+ years of hardening for MySQL and InnoDB. PlanetScale adds some (imho) great features on top of that, but it's standing …

  11. comment
    Comment #27202784

    Already on it. :) https://vitess.io/docs/reference/vreplication/vreplication/

  12. comment
    Comment #27202055

    To be clear, this is not a Vitess/PlanetScale-specific opinion or choice. Foreign key constraints are a bit of a controversial topic in large-scale MySQL environments in general, w…

  13. comment
    Comment #27201412

    Vitess' compatibility with MySQL has made major leaps in the past couple of versions and the team has started focusing on locking in ongoing compatibility with various popular deve…

  14. comment
    Comment #27201044

    That is exactly what we _do_ support. Our team includes the original developer of gh-ost for MySQL, which has been built to execute these kinds of massive changes at scale at GitHu…

  15. comment
    Comment #27200472

    The "ease" we used to refer to in Vitess primarily relates to its interaction with the application side, where it basically presents itself as "one big MySQL datastore". It uses a …

  16. comment
    Comment #27200133

    It's closer to your original assumption than your second. Branching relies on vreplication, and it does actually allow you to develop multiple versions of your schema against your …

  17. comment
    Comment #27198961

    This is monthly. :)