Viewing profile — lizztheblizz
lizztheblizz
HN member- Joined
- Tue, May 18, 2021, 5:05 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 50
- Public activity
- 17 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About lizztheblizz
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #43355913
Hi there, PS employee here. In AWS, the instance types backing our Metal class are currently in the following families: r6id, i4i, i3en and i7ie. We're deploying across multiple cl…
-
comment
Comment #33427812
Lambda was a means to an end for us here, and we're not specifically endorsing its use in _this_ way. Our goal was explicitly to test our ability to handle many parallel connection…
-
comment
Comment #33427563
Article author here. I fully endorse Aaron's correction and appreciate the call-out. For context: I initially wrote this paragraph to include more flavor and history around crash r…
-
comment
Comment #33427292
So, disclaimer, I am not an Amazon Billing wizard, but given that we ran the Lambdas from an isolated sub account, I can be particularly certain that I was able to filter this down…
-
comment
Comment #33427190
Absolutely agreed. As others have already pointed out, there is no underlying implication of preference to this kind of application architecture. Since we do run an actual DBaaS, o…
-
comment
Comment #33427039
Article author here, interesting question! We didn't run into that issue, explicitly. Our setup was effectively as follows: - AWS Lambda functions being spawned in us-east-1, from …
-
comment
Comment #27203608
I don't have nearly the experience in Postgres environments to have seen the same level of real-world impact there, but a quick search presents me with the following documentation,…
-
comment
Comment #27203559
Depends. Have any examples of "normal" sharded MySQL databases? EDIT: To clarify, sharding is not a standard feature included in Community Edition MySQL. Over the years, there have…
-
comment
Comment #27202976
Give it a shot, because the current implementation specifically side steps the need for that full copy, and does let you test functionally against fully up-to-date production data.…
-
comment
Comment #27202914
12+ years of massive scale production use for Vitess and 26+ years of hardening for MySQL and InnoDB. PlanetScale adds some (imho) great features on top of that, but it's standing …
-
comment
Comment #27202784
Already on it. :) https://vitess.io/docs/reference/vreplication/vreplication/
-
comment
Comment #27202055
To be clear, this is not a Vitess/PlanetScale-specific opinion or choice. Foreign key constraints are a bit of a controversial topic in large-scale MySQL environments in general, w…
-
comment
Comment #27201412
Vitess' compatibility with MySQL has made major leaps in the past couple of versions and the team has started focusing on locking in ongoing compatibility with various popular deve…
-
comment
Comment #27201044
That is exactly what we _do_ support. Our team includes the original developer of gh-ost for MySQL, which has been built to execute these kinds of massive changes at scale at GitHu…
-
comment
Comment #27200472
The "ease" we used to refer to in Vitess primarily relates to its interaction with the application side, where it basically presents itself as "one big MySQL datastore". It uses a …
-
comment
Comment #27200133
It's closer to your original assumption than your second. Branching relies on vreplication, and it does actually allow you to develop multiple versions of your schema against your …
-
comment
Comment #27198961
This is monthly. :)