Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — linkdink

linkdink

HN member
Joined
Sun, Jul 10, 2022, 2:17 PM UTC
HN karma
91
Public activity
67 items

About linkdink

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #33255351

    With occupational safety, just like anything else, you can hire professionals and set whatever objectives and deadlines your budget allows. Companies that embrace it get much bette…

  2. comment
    Comment #33249869

    Maybe it will lead to treating the oceans as more of an actively managed resource. So that's one possibly positive thing that could partially offset the inevitable negatives. Perso…

  3. comment
  4. comment
    Comment #33242346

    So there's no benefit to collaborating because of distances and time scales. A system of machines is plausible, so there's a non-zero risk of encountering something like that. Civi…

  5. comment
    Comment #33237560

    I thought those were all-in-one nanobot things?

  6. comment
  7. comment
    Comment #33236526

    Is that really an old story? There's usually no memory allocation after initial startup in safety- and mission-critical systems. Rolling over past the max value of an integer data …

  8. comment
    Comment #33236446

    Still a strawman because I didn't say sci fi replicators. You could make an automated system that travels, mines, and manufactures. Like a 3D printer that prints copies of itself. …

  9. comment
    Comment #33232883

    Replicator machines could outlive their creators. Then maybe most civilizations think it's safer not to risk being discovered by one, just in case it exists. That seems reasonable …

  10. comment
    Comment #33231414

    The DFH doesn't claim that the aliens would be "god-like" per your definition. They just have a first-strike capability and motive to use it. Could be a low risk-tolerance for coex…

  11. comment
    Comment #33227978

    By keeping up with capabilities, features, and compatibility. The algorithm doesn't become wrong, but it and the implementation do get surpassed in utility.

  12. comment
  13. comment
    Comment #33012072

    The line sounded funnier to me in the less pedantic way.

  14. comment
    Comment #33003228

    > The Mercury-4 is the culmination of years of research I'm imagining some researcher after years of investment and experimentation eventually accidentally discovering the solution…

  15. comment
    Comment #32968495

    That's something that mechanics books do a lot better than EE books, as far as I've seen.

  16. comment
    Comment #32955477

    That's already how the world works. The bridge design company takes out insurance reflecting their liability. If something happens, they pay. If their supplier messed up a componen…

  17. comment
    Comment #32950847

    I have a copy. I wouldn't say it's "too light" because there's nowhere else to easily get this type of information, especially not all in one place. There's no "heavier" alternativ…

  18. comment
  19. comment
    Comment #32943161

    You're conflating drag with drag coefficient. The plot you linked doesn't say anything about drag. Drag is more strongly proportional to speed than drag coefficient. That type of p…

  20. comment
  21. comment
    Comment #32919265

    Can they at least let me make it smaller? I did the workaround with the registry setting, but it cuts off some of the time and date.

  22. comment
    Comment #32898800

    That ambiguity is where a judge has to use their judgement. So it's interesting that they started with the assumption that they had to make a mutually exclusive choice, but didn't …

  23. comment
    Comment #32877631

    The majority shares your layman's understanding, but the dissent does not. Last paragraph of page 111 basically says that the whole point of 230, as confirmed by the person who wro…

  24. comment
    Comment #32877595

    The last paragraph of page 111 is interesting because I don't think the majority opinion tries to rebut that criticism, and it destroys the premise of most of their arguments. It's…

  25. comment