Viewing profile — liambigelow
liambigelow
HN member- Joined
- Tue, Mar 02, 2021, 8:18 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 105
- Public activity
- 47 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About liambigelow
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #47066583
CAA records including an accounturi already expose the account identity in the same manner, so I feel like that ship has already sailed somewhat (and I would prefer that the CAA an…
-
comment
Comment #44307846
Serious answer: For some, they do change semi-often and don't feel compelled to declare stability. In other cases, it's a stable + widely used 0.x package, and bumping it to 1.0 us…
-
comment
Comment #44307828
https://0ver.org/#notable-zerover-projects
-
comment
Comment #42514518
[ https://truncate.town/](https://truncate.town/) is all egui (after the main menu)
-
comment
Comment #42320766
Yeah I agree, and do the same. Likewise some config gets complex and can only be reasonably set through config. I prefer when I have a system with one base configuration struct whe…
-
comment
Comment #42314411
Ah nice, will peep — in the interest of sharing here is my latest "template" that gets copied from project to project: https://github.com/CloudCannon/toolproof/blob/main/toolproof.…
-
comment
Comment #42313991
Looks nice! I like the approach. My holy grail will still be landing on a good multi-layer configuration setup for Rust CLIs. Ideally CLI flags merged over top of environment varia…
-
comment
Comment #42013992
I prefer Tidal’s UI and album management. Tidal also has a good notification system for new releases, and otherwise gets out of the way. I moved to Tidal from Apple Music, but woul…
-
comment
Comment #41464538
There can be more of a difference than you might expect. In static site generators, Eleventy is about as fast as you can get in the JavaScript world, and is still 2-3x the time for…
-
comment
Comment #39966041
Thanks for the kind words! Many good notes, we'll look into a lot of that. And yes currently it's deliberate, but I think we can squeeze some AI swaps in!
-
comment
Comment #39966036
Good ideas! Thanks for the notes :) Yes dictionary is a tough thing to nail down perfectly — to start with we're going to highlight existing words on the board that are invalid, bu…
-
comment
Comment #39892129
Not at the moment, but it's only a question of finding good dictionaries to expand the language support :)
-
comment
Comment #39889289
Amazing! Thanks for the detailed notes, and the insight. Dictionary does still need work — especially around some words like soiree which got culled by our dictionary builder. We'l…
-
comment
Comment #39889210
Yeah that's probably the best solution.
-
comment
Comment #39889139
Great suggestions, thanks!
-
comment
Comment #39889123
Thanks for the kind words! On 1. — this is definitely the most common piece of feedback so far, so we'll certainly look into it. On 2. — the battles rules are the most complex part…
-
comment
Comment #39889085
Thanks for the comment — we'll take another crack at clarifying the starting position :)
-
comment
Comment #39888916
Thanks for the feedback — it's looking like we'll have to find some solution for showing valid words, based on the comments. (Also, will fix the dictionary, thanks!)
-
comment
Comment #39888830
Interesting suggestions, and thanks for the kind words! Definitely things to ponder :)
-
comment
Comment #39888778
Good ideas, will check out the queens gambit game :)
-
comment
Comment #39888749
Nice! We've had this on the list for a while so this is great validation for building it :)
-
comment
Comment #39888729
Thanks for the great notes! Agree on all front re: the dictionary ergonomics. We'll look at smoothing that out (mobile is currently the blocker there, but everything is solvable :)…
-
comment
Comment #39887239
Oh good note thanks, my mistake. It should be MIT, I'll add the license today.
-
comment
Comment #39887192
Amazing, thanks for the feedback! > edit: seems like the board editing in multiplayer mode doesn't work oops, will get onto fixing that
-
comment
Comment #39884092
Ah, 2am reading comprehension on my part. Yes, if we ever remove rather than add to the dictionary in the future I might look to axe it.