Viewing profile — levn11

my life: https://www.techrxiv.org/users/717330/articles/702287-on-fer...

i mean https://www.techrxiv.org/users/717330/articles/702287-on-fer... ...

https://www.techrxiv.org/users/717330/articles/702287-on-fer...

so how much do you just stare at grass and yell at the sky

I would make food shelters and start a school, a dream of mine.

it follows specifically from the form on pages 1-3. i would recommend reading it with fresh eyes after a good night's rest.

I won't reply further to this question about g, i do think i've been clear. and at this point you can be on your merry way still thinking it's wrong. but you simply misunderstood.

it's a proof by contradiction. g would divide a+b-c IF a+b-c are integers. for n=2, g(2)=(c-a)(c-b)g_1(2) and g_1(2)=2. So only when n=2 is it true that g divides a+b-c. Otherwise …

i believe you skipped pages 1-3. g_1(2)=2 for all a,b,c with n=2. g(n) carries with it the assumption of a^n+b^n=c^n as i showed in pages 1-3.

This is only true for a,b,c that satisfies a^2+b^2=c^2. So a=b=3 and c=n=2 is not part of the solution set.

https://www.techrxiv.org/users/717330/articles/702287-on-fer...

which part

https://www.techrxiv.org/users/717330/articles/702287-on-fer...

Exactly. I have my degree as well, so I was doing some research of my own. It’s an ongoing thing.

techrxiv.org/doi/full/10.36227/techrxiv.170629872.29614231/v1

Seems like some kind of novel approach. Looks right to me. But my math is okay, so I need better eyes.

https://figshare.com/articles/preprint/Fermat_s_Last_and_the...

PLEASE read this as this is literally about thinking of center of mass as existing in more than 0 dimensions. the book is called The Zero Point Paradox and has everything to do abo…

They did nothing, apparently. Just kept on keeping on

Location: Los Angeles, CA Remote: yes Willing to relocate: maybe Technologies: i have a masters in applied math, i know python, i wrote a book, and i am publishing a math proof. Bu…

They quickly delete any posts related to such a proof. Or at least any of my posts about it

Number theory and spacetime! I have a proof for an old number theory problem