Viewing profile — lerno
lerno
HN member- Joined
- Tue, Apr 01, 2014, 11:46 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 1,420
- Public activity
- 405 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About lerno
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #48904767
This isn't a very exciting release: it adds a few useful things to libraries and to generic compile time introspection – but that's pretty much it. Just some incremental improvemen…
- story
- comment
-
comment
Comment #48854070
Counterpoint: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47989154
-
comment
Comment #48853023
One funny thing is that if you go on codeberg and want to submit a PR to Zig, you can't. Because Zig's too big for Codeberg, and you're over your free quota, so you can't push your…
-
comment
Comment #48786783
Early days of Wikipedia was the wild west. Surely you must agree to that.
-
comment
Comment #48786701
No, Grokipedia is just a crapfest. I'm talking about actually asking ChatGPT
-
comment
Comment #48786692
And as an example of bias: I personally witnessed a wikipedia editors adding their own interpretation of a certain written article. This interpretation was very politically biased …
-
comment
Comment #48786350
The C3 grokipedia entry was horribly bad, so I don't really have a favourable impression of it.
-
comment
Comment #48786278
It's funny. Today people say that of Wikipedia, as if it was trustworthy. But it used to be common knowledge to just "don't trust anything on Wikipedia". Wikipedia was never like a…
-
comment
Comment #48786210
What kind of happens is that there are some people who invest their lives in Wikipedia, their opinions is what ends up mattering. This has boths pros and cons. The good thing about…
-
comment
Comment #48740173
The Zig C import is going away, moving into a tool invoked from build.zig, so this might not be an ideal thing to point to. C3 just has everything C compatible so not just calling …
-
comment
Comment #48740078
If you use LLVM at least, they expand to a lot of code which is repeated on every operation. There’s a point where the inline code will just blow the instruction cache and just cre…
-
comment
Comment #48678502
$400k is serious money and will certainly help keeping the Zig team funded. I must gratulate Andrew and the team on their ability to create a product that is creating this kind of …
-
comment
Comment #48678215
Zig syntax has been mostly stable since 0.2, it is extremely unlikely it will change beyond tweaks. You have to go to Odin, C3 or (in the future) Jai for an alternative.
- story
-
comment
Comment #48391340
As a contrast to Zig: C3 is strongly invested in contracts and is able to use them for static analysis at compile time to some degree.
-
comment
Comment #47989961
The difference is that in the unsigned case you get a seemingly plausible value, and in the signed case you get a negative value which you can be sure is wrong. This is the problem…
- story
-
comment
Comment #47832376
Odin started in 2017, had a fraction of the contributors and is soon 1.0, so that explanation isn’t cutting it. If you instead look at the over 500 kloc of the Zig source compared …
-
comment
Comment #47832268
I think Andrew should seriously think about decoupling the toolchain from the language to put focus on reaching stability there. As it is, we have the compiler with surrounding too…
-
comment
Comment #47673496
C3 0.7.11 is the final release in the 0.7 series. This version focuses on tightening semantics, improving type inference, and cleaning up edge cases rather than adding new features…
- story
-
comment
Comment #47336869
I just have to add another reflection: One thing that tends to be overlooked when discussing changes is the ecosystem effect of frequent changes. A language that breaks frequently …
-
comment
Comment #47336650
> Not at all, if the team needs 30 more years they should take it. Yes, I understand that is the opinion in the Zig community. As an outsider, it seems odd to me to pick a language…