Viewing profile — lemagedurage
lemagedurage
HN member- Joined
- Sat, Sep 17, 2016, 9:55 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 665
- Public activity
- 174 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About lemagedurage
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #48958525
Sometimes it feels like we're living in an episode of Silicon Valley, the show.
-
comment
Comment #48944834
Well I don't think the position of planets when you're born has a large correlation to how your life will go. On the other hand, how an AI writes will have a big correlation to whe…
-
comment
Comment #48944806
I just feel like, from the POV of AI companies, that reducing the amount of em dashes they use to "blend in" more and talk more human-like, for the sake of being less detectable, w…
-
comment
Comment #48944168
That just proves that perfect classification is impossible. Classification doesn't need to be 100% accurate to be useful.
-
comment
Comment #48944151
The 80% accuracy from the article would be one reason to believe there's significant correlation, no?
-
comment
Comment #48944118
Why would sounding human be a goal rather than a byproduct of trying to communicate efficiently?
-
comment
Comment #48916854
The problem seems to be deeper rooted. Cursor doesn't see cloning a repo with Cursor and code execution as separate security boundaries. Cursor ships with Workspace Trust disabled …
-
comment
Comment #48916116
You're right, looks like they changed it, though Task should still work. > In version 2.1.63, the Task tool was renamed to Agent. Existing Task(...) references in settings and agen…
-
comment
Comment #48888090
True. For Claude Code, I disabled explore subagents globally by adding this to ~/.claude/settings.json: "permissions": { "deny": [ "Task(Explore)" ] }
-
comment
Comment #48888037
"LGTM" That'll be $50 — please.
-
comment
Comment #48830457
Ehh, AI makes plenty mistakes but they have a different vibe to it. In my mind an AI would do something the most popular way even when that's not appropriate. A human might do thin…
-
comment
Comment #48830146
Maybe they added the comments to get a longer payload for the sake of the shirt's design. The comments can be more cute/awe inspiring for people who aren't as familiar with bash bu…
-
comment
Comment #48830073
I don't think it was written by an LLM, some things stand out: The congratulations text is both in English and Japanese. Contains a single heart emoji. There was an intention to ha…
-
comment
Comment #48827342
Sounds like a convenience feature for a dev that they forgot to remove before distribution, since it's this poorly hidden.
-
comment
Comment #48827159
Use cases range from sending 100s of requests per second just to bring a website down to doing a montly request to a municipality's endpoint to get a local dashboard of when trash …
-
comment
Comment #48654935
If a vulnerability disclosure program has a good track record of paying out, and legitimate reports get refunded, why not? Again, the alternative might be shutting down the program…
-
comment
Comment #48654880
Have you considered requiring a small payment for vulnerability disclosure? Refund it on payout. This should be very effective at deterring spammers. It also sucks for real reports…
-
comment
Comment #48626571
Both sides are not looking too pretty here.
-
comment
Comment #48626555
Having their business transparent makes sense but by restricting people's personal lives like this would disincentivize good people from rising to power, which is not what we want.…
-
comment
Comment #48617786
People connect through cellphones more on weekends, and cellular has higher IPv6 usage.
-
comment
Comment #48617712
> AI makes it cheap to write code. That is not the same as it being cheap to ship it, or to maintain it. One participant put it cleanly: cognitive debt is the new technical debt. I…
-
comment
Comment #48617565
I think the differentiator is whether someone cares about what they build or not. Someone who doesn't care wouldn't produce masterpieces without AI, and using AI isn't going to pre…
-
comment
Comment #48616372
Wow hang on, I'm suggesting to use AI as a code writing aid, not to increase scope until owning the design becomes unreasonable.
-
comment
Comment #48616263
You can't, so you do read the code.
-
comment
Comment #48615686
Own the design and let AI write the code. Spend the extra free time on becoming a better/broader architect.