Viewing profile — lawstudent2
lawstudent2
HN member- Joined
- Mon, Aug 17, 2015, 6:32 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 72
- Public activity
- 25 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About lawstudent2
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #10697917
Many, many, many people are clamoring to outlaw gambling in the very, very few places it is currently legal, myself included. Right now Draftkings and whatever that other one is ar…
-
comment
Comment #10561241
Rather than try to bring coal mining back to this community as a form of social subsidy - why not just institute a basic federal income? These folks are not alone - they are just t…
-
comment
Comment #10560742
Yes. It does. It absolutely does. http://www.productliabilityprevention.com/images/5-PostSaleD... http://www.cassiday.com/maa-dri-productliability/ If a post-sale modification of a…
-
comment
Comment #10560288
What on earth are you talking about? There is an entire, rich, enormous field of law called products liability that is precisely about holding manufacturers accountable for the per…
-
comment
Comment #10466820
As posted in another thread: > These laws that were passed to prop up car dealerships and came about in an era without mass marketing, but, very importantly, and self-acknowledgled…
-
comment
Comment #10466788
It isn't my opinion. http://www.npr.org/sections/money/2013/02/19/172402376/why-b... http://www.americanbar.org/publications/franchise_lawyer/201... What bugs the hell out of me is…
-
comment
Comment #10464465
Yeah, but this is bullshit. We do know. The laws are garbage and should go the way of the dodo.
-
comment
Comment #10464460
We know why it was put up. This is not a mystery. It was lobbied for by car dealerships in order to procure monopoly status, under the guise of 'consumer protection.' This is kind …
-
comment
Comment #10374785
> I'd be curious to know if anyone on HN thinks that this is morally and ethically ok? 1. Yes. Absolutely. What could be morally unacceptable about this? 2. I very strongly believe…
-
comment
Comment #10166796
At no point in this post is there anything remotely resembling an example of what the author is talking about. With the exception of the reference to active record, the author coul…
-
comment
Comment #10161167
Mmmm... no. * Phoropter * Tribution * Slickle * Cadine * Fination * Apricity * Revergent * Unitory * Trephony These are not words. They are not highly specific jargon either. They …
-
comment
Comment #10126247
No - I stand by that as a literal use. Does 65B represent the actual money value that people will pay for the shares of 100% of the ~600 currently existing YC companies? Does it te…
-
comment
Comment #10125889
This is also rather misleading - because 300 have been shut down, 904 have been funded, which includes 107 in the last batch, which can be discounted entirely from these stats. Thi…
-
comment
Comment #10117919
Oh right. Math. Yes. Good call.
-
comment
Comment #10117876
Those salaries seem absurdly low. Also, why is the cost of employees with overhead lower? (NB/EDIT: Pointed out below this is for 3/4 of the year, not the full year - but the rest …
-
comment
Comment #10094908
In the world of business, good ideas are literally priceless - in that they have literally no value. Good ideas aren't even that important to a business. Good execution is what mat…
-
comment
Comment #10094569
Because the question is not about general law principles. It is testing to see if you know the tort of public disclosure of private facts and if you know about the right of publici…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #10085959
I follow - in my practice, when dealing with the phrase "employment agreement" it almost always refers to an agreement with a fixed or minimum term of employment. This is all besid…
-
comment
Comment #10085814
> Is it significantly different from talking to a priest or a faith healer? * Faith healers are priests aren't trained in the myriad forms of double blind tested, peer reviewed tec…
-
comment
Comment #10075527
> How long does the period of continued employment need to be in order to be considered further consideration? Non-zero. In reality, my guess is that because courts don't love to s…
-
comment
Comment #10075506
> My understanding is, if your Hawaiian employer demanded you sign a noncompete, you could quit on the spot and the noncompete would not apply. Is that correct? Yes.
-
comment
Comment #10075458
Are you getting more money? Yes? More money = more consideration. End of story.
-
comment
Comment #10075455
I'm a practicing corporate lawyer - i just have the same sn on reddit as on here. And yeah, I did read the case, and you are wrong. A contract between an employer and employee is n…
-
comment
Comment #10075103
I am a lawyer - and the headline is completely misleading. Continued employment is, in fact, new consideration. Each new paycheck you get, in an at-will employment relationship, is…