Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — lawstudent2

lawstudent2

HN member
Joined
Mon, Aug 17, 2015, 6:32 PM UTC
HN karma
72
Public activity
25 items

About lawstudent2

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #10697917

    Many, many, many people are clamoring to outlaw gambling in the very, very few places it is currently legal, myself included. Right now Draftkings and whatever that other one is ar…

  2. comment
    Comment #10561241

    Rather than try to bring coal mining back to this community as a form of social subsidy - why not just institute a basic federal income? These folks are not alone - they are just t…

  3. comment
    Comment #10560742

    Yes. It does. It absolutely does. http://www.productliabilityprevention.com/images/5-PostSaleD... http://www.cassiday.com/maa-dri-productliability/ If a post-sale modification of a…

  4. comment
    Comment #10560288

    What on earth are you talking about? There is an entire, rich, enormous field of law called products liability that is precisely about holding manufacturers accountable for the per…

  5. comment
    Comment #10466820

    As posted in another thread: > These laws that were passed to prop up car dealerships and came about in an era without mass marketing, but, very importantly, and self-acknowledgled…

  6. comment
    Comment #10466788

    It isn't my opinion. http://www.npr.org/sections/money/2013/02/19/172402376/why-b... http://www.americanbar.org/publications/franchise_lawyer/201... What bugs the hell out of me is…

  7. comment
    Comment #10464465

    Yeah, but this is bullshit. We do know. The laws are garbage and should go the way of the dodo.

  8. comment
    Comment #10464460

    We know why it was put up. This is not a mystery. It was lobbied for by car dealerships in order to procure monopoly status, under the guise of 'consumer protection.' This is kind …

  9. comment
    Comment #10374785

    > I'd be curious to know if anyone on HN thinks that this is morally and ethically ok? 1. Yes. Absolutely. What could be morally unacceptable about this? 2. I very strongly believe…

  10. comment
    Comment #10166796

    At no point in this post is there anything remotely resembling an example of what the author is talking about. With the exception of the reference to active record, the author coul…

  11. comment
    Comment #10161167

    Mmmm... no. * Phoropter * Tribution * Slickle * Cadine * Fination * Apricity * Revergent * Unitory * Trephony These are not words. They are not highly specific jargon either. They …

  12. comment
    Comment #10126247

    No - I stand by that as a literal use. Does 65B represent the actual money value that people will pay for the shares of 100% of the ~600 currently existing YC companies? Does it te…

  13. comment
    Comment #10125889

    This is also rather misleading - because 300 have been shut down, 904 have been funded, which includes 107 in the last batch, which can be discounted entirely from these stats. Thi…

  14. comment
    Comment #10117919

    Oh right. Math. Yes. Good call.

  15. comment
    Comment #10117876

    Those salaries seem absurdly low. Also, why is the cost of employees with overhead lower? (NB/EDIT: Pointed out below this is for 3/4 of the year, not the full year - but the rest …

  16. comment
    Comment #10094908

    In the world of business, good ideas are literally priceless - in that they have literally no value. Good ideas aren't even that important to a business. Good execution is what mat…

  17. comment
    Comment #10094569

    Because the question is not about general law principles. It is testing to see if you know the tort of public disclosure of private facts and if you know about the right of publici…

  18. comment
  19. comment
    Comment #10085959

    I follow - in my practice, when dealing with the phrase "employment agreement" it almost always refers to an agreement with a fixed or minimum term of employment. This is all besid…

  20. comment
    Comment #10085814

    > Is it significantly different from talking to a priest or a faith healer? * Faith healers are priests aren't trained in the myriad forms of double blind tested, peer reviewed tec…

  21. comment
    Comment #10075527

    > How long does the period of continued employment need to be in order to be considered further consideration? Non-zero. In reality, my guess is that because courts don't love to s…

  22. comment
    Comment #10075506

    > My understanding is, if your Hawaiian employer demanded you sign a noncompete, you could quit on the spot and the noncompete would not apply. Is that correct? Yes.

  23. comment
    Comment #10075458

    Are you getting more money? Yes? More money = more consideration. End of story.

  24. comment
    Comment #10075455

    I'm a practicing corporate lawyer - i just have the same sn on reddit as on here. And yeah, I did read the case, and you are wrong. A contract between an employer and employee is n…

  25. comment
    Comment #10075103

    I am a lawyer - and the headline is completely misleading. Continued employment is, in fact, new consideration. Each new paycheck you get, in an at-will employment relationship, is…