Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — lavrov

lavrov

HN member
Joined
Sat, Jun 18, 2016, 10:40 PM UTC
HN karma
250
Public activity
32 items

About lavrov

[ my public key: https://keybase.io/bpfarmer; my proof: https://keybase.io/bpfarmer/sigs/J5wkXj7N-pzvsXeJYHm9NVusF1a4qe_EhFB-IlwGLZQ ]

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #24032450

    What do you think happened in El Salvador, Chile, Argentina, Iran, Indonesia, Nicaragua, Honduras, etc

  2. comment
    Comment #23298526

    Didn’t read the entire post but I think the characterization of PCP’s is a bit off - some SNARK constructions and STARKs both use PCP’s - using a linear PCP vs a PCP doesn’t impact…

  3. comment
    Comment #19362012

    It seems like a VRF might be a more natural choice than a commitment scheme for verifiable randomness, since it doesn't require any honesty assumption for participants, and Keybase…

  4. comment
    Comment #18706438

    I thought that the post was fairly unclear, but for me, it seems like the main argument against 538 is that it makes unfalsifiable claims about the probability of individual electi…

  5. comment
    Comment #18205612

    Not a pilot, and not trying to be an armchair pilot, but why would he have ascended all the way to 36000 feet? Isn't there a real risk of depressurization with hull damage?

  6. comment
    Comment #17995494

    You misread my comment - I'm saying that the argument is not that the fact that this other measure of unemployment is much higher than the standard measure shows that the economy i…

  7. comment
    Comment #17989864

    I don't agree that using the OECD employment rate is bullshit. The argument is not that at a single point, the fact that this other measure of unemployment is much higher than the …

  8. comment
    Comment #17988872

    Why not? Determining how we measure the health of our economy, and implicitly, what we want to optimize for, is a political process, not simply an objective, scientific one.

  9. comment
    Comment #17988320

    The point that he's making is not that individual observation should trump objective measures, but the epistemic claim that if what we perceive contradicts those measures, it's wor…

  10. comment
    Comment #17771676

    The emphasis on humor in Mozart and Beethoven is interesting, particularly since it seems almost absent in the later Sonatas. I remember hearing Martha Argerich note that it's pres…

  11. comment
  12. comment
    Comment #17561278

    Verifiable computation is an active and developed area of research in cryptography, and the validation method of having every node run every step of every computation is the most n…

  13. comment
    Comment #17561225

    Sure, I'm assuming that most of the transactions are trading/speculation, given that 60% of ETH is held on exchanges, and if the question is how we should value ETH, a measure that…

  14. comment
    Comment #17561200

    That position isn't supported by volatile transaction fee data - excepting spikes for spam or high traffic, the transaction fee denominated in dollars generally tracks the price of…

  15. comment
    Comment #17560779

    Forks aren't as simple as you might think - who gets to determine what the "original chain" is in the event of a fork? Suppose that ETH forked and one version changed some consensu…

  16. comment
    Comment #17560246

    For example, if the market cap were 1/100 of its current value, then the transaction fees per year, denominated in dollars, would be $1800000, yielding the same "P/E" multiple, and…

  17. comment
    Comment #17560091

    When discussing how crypto-assets should be valued: > In that case, you can take the simple model and say a cryptocurrency’s valuation is the net present value of the transaction f…

  18. comment
    Comment #17559927

    Maybe I'm just being cynical (or jealous!), but when I read "Vitalik Buterin, who has managed to synthesize insights across those fields into successful, real-world applications li…

  19. comment
    Comment #17533793

    The security proof for SNARKs requires constant-depth compliance predicates, otherwise the proof doesn’t follow because the extractor size could blow up. I would have to read the c…

  20. comment
    Comment #17532846

    I’m not sure why there is a misunderstanding here, especially given that you work for a wallet provider. The attack is as described: an attacker forks, mines invalid blocks, which …

  21. comment
    Comment #17531198

    Yes, I agree that the top-level SNARK will obviously have a high level of security wrt soundness, but suppose that I have a SNARK recursively computing 2^128 SNARKs, you’re claimin…

  22. comment
    Comment #17531170

    No, my point is that light wallets don’t validate the content of blocks...so an attacker could create a long chain of invalid blocks and fool light clients. That’s a significant is…

  23. comment
    Comment #17530195

    Ordinarily, light wallets compromise on validating blocks, so that’s one benefit.

  24. comment
    Comment #17530186

    Coda seems interesting, but I don’t understand how a single feature (fast light client syncing) can be enough of an advantage to launch a new chain - what prevents a new chain from…

  25. comment