Viewing profile — lastingwin

Hobbling the battery with software has nothing to do with safety and definitely is not federally-protected.

> But if you don't want that to happen, you can just pay for the full-priced version. I would never buy hardware from a company that locks the capacity down with software, so a Tes…

> am somehow being ripped off by not using 100% of available capacity? If you paid for capacity that you don't need then yeah, I'd say you at the very least made a bad purchase.

If I paid for it and it's in my possession, I own it and will do what I like with it including rooting the software. If that's not possible I won't buy it. In any case I'll always …

It's bad because someone is restricting the capabilities of hardware that you own and trying to extract fees to "unlock" it.

That is also beyond ridiculous and bad for the consumer. I feel like this is even worse though because it also includes environmental damage due to decreased efficiency and excess …

It's bad for all consumers, even if you don't buy a Tesla. It encourages other manufactures to software lock hardware you own. Soon there won't be any alternatives, I choose to obj…

> It's worth a reminder that batteries are heavy. They're the heaviest collective part of an electric car, and reducing the usable energy density of a pack by 27% and not the vehic…

> A well fed rebel without a cause with a government aided financial safety net. There's no safety net in the US and we have the homelessness to prove it. What you're seeing is the…

I think it's safe to say that we should disregard any substack/medium posts, especially when it comes to AI.