Viewing profile — lasfter
lasfter
HN member- Joined
- Sun, Jan 04, 2015, 1:32 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 741
- Public activity
- 143 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About lasfter
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #45853984
Here it is: https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&h...
-
comment
Comment #45747505
I wrote my thesis on this! Application-specific system design can get you orders of magnitude performance improvement, as well as better scalability/fault tolerance properties. I f…
-
comment
Comment #39096668
> We haven't really seen socialism/communism without a high degree of authoritarianism, which I also don't really like, so I'm inclined to support working towards socialism democra…
-
comment
Comment #39096052
The confusion is the system working as intended I think. It is taught from a young age that Marxism/socialism is about annihilating freedom and personal property, while capitalism …
-
comment
Comment #39095894
If everyone has access to food, shelter, transportation, and health care, in what ways would we even still have capitalism? Like, what happens to landlords? Will we fund this stuff…
-
comment
Comment #39095290
You cannot have capitalism without the bad stuff unless capital's interests are best served in abstaining from bad stuff. Unfortunately, it seems impossible to set up a system that…
-
comment
Comment #39022950
Let's disregard that the USA encouraged Sadam to invade Kuwait and implied he would face no recourse if he did. Would you have been okay with Russia going to Iraq's aid when the US…
-
comment
Comment #37986703
Small correction, it's Emmanuelle Charpatier.
-
comment
Comment #36765406
Absolutely, 6 years with a 1.2mil grant is ridiculous. I was just hopeful that somewhere there were PhD students making enough money to live from research
-
comment
Comment #36762502
Where are you seeing $44k? The link you gave shows payscales for postdocs, and points to another page [1] showing that predoctoral trainees get $27k. Also, in my field and in my re…
-
comment
Comment #36047841
Any chance you could expand on this? I hear about pattern matching for fraud analytics but I have never seen concrete examples, or even anything in the literature.
-
comment
Comment #36039981
I don't know what you expect me to measure about two different visions of non-existent utopia. Are you suggesting capitalism is not supposed to give control to the capitalist? Or t…
-
comment
Comment #36038410
You're talking about democracy vs dictatorship, which is orthogonal to socialism vs capitalism. In a socialist utopia you have more democracy than in a capitalist utopia, because "…
-
comment
Comment #36035682
Are you not thinking of capitalism as it exists today? Wanton military spending, bank bailouts, corporate tax cuts, etc. seem to be very common when money can buy legislators.
- comment
-
comment
Comment #36023005
Maciej Besta, the first author of this paper, is a machine. Aside from coordinating big groups to write tons of papers, he does a bunch of impressive wilderness exploration. I reco…
-
comment
Comment #35963331
[1] argues a crucial component of greening is trees "pumping" water from the oceans inland and creating nutritious soil. Otherwise evaporated water is simply blown away by the wind…
-
comment
Comment #35932695
So it's not clickbait, right? This is how they hack HN!
-
comment
Comment #35724434
Without any prior forethought. Immediately, on a whim. E.g., "We were in Vegas and saw an Elvis chapel, so we spontaneously decided to get married!" They were in Vegas without any …
-
comment
Comment #35695232
The fact that the authors are still residing within Iran may also play a role in how much they attribute to Islam.
-
comment
Comment #34618476
> Culture is not required to take subterfuge in dog whistles. Only counterculture is. > Culture is what's uncontroversially and fearlessly blasted on front pages, and on mainstream…
-
comment
Comment #34618041
> But why? If this is really the majority sentiment, why on earth leave any room for plausible deniability? If you read the comment you're replying to, it answers that question imm…
-
comment
Comment #34617737
Ok fine, here's my answer then: they don't need to, because their voters know the GOP doesn't work against white people. I suspect it's different from your answer.
-
comment
Comment #34617688
If you read the examples I gave above, they're not vague. Dog-whistles are more for plausible deniability than subtlety, and it's because (shocker) white supremacy is frowned upon.…
-
comment
Comment #34616911
You are being dishonest because examples of the GOP pandering to white voters are well-documented and easily accessible. Either you never looked, in which case arguing at all is di…