Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — laktek

laktek

HN member
Joined
Tue, Mar 25, 2008, 6:03 AM UTC
HN karma
2,307
Public activity
443 items

About laktek

Edge Functions @ Supabase

Contact: lakshan [at] laktek [dot] com

Blog: https://www.laktek.com

Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/laktek

Recent public activity

  1. story
  2. story
  3. story
  4. comment
    Comment #45888505

    >It would be interesting if Supabase allows me to use that runtime without forcing me to use supabase, being a separated product on its own. It's possible for you to self-host Edge…

  5. story
  6. comment
    Comment #45881873

    > Also think the time for a FOSS alternative is coming. Serverless without, virtually, cold starts is here to stay but being tied to only 1 vendor is problematic. Supabase Edge Fun…

  7. comment
    Comment #44140462

    I'm the author of the blog post. To add more context, kids have been living with their grandparents from birth (extended family home). And grandparents usually help with the feedin…

  8. story
  9. comment
    Comment #42090423

    More than a year now. This allows us to offer our own built-in APIs like `Supabase.ai` https://supabase.com/blog/ai-inference-now-available-in-supa...

  10. comment
    Comment #42087760

    Waiting for Deno 2.1 LTS release :)

  11. comment
    Comment #42087748

    Nope, we currently have our own hosting platform, which runs the EdgeRuntime.

  12. comment
    Comment #42080640

    Congrats on the launch! It's great to see more companies build serverless offerings on top of Deno. I lead Supabase Edge Functions product, a similar offering built on top of Deno …

  13. comment
    Comment #42080551

    I think the closest thing we got is the Default fetch export https://docs.deno.com/runtime/fundamentals/http_server/#defa... , which Cloudflare Workers, Deno Deploy and Supabase Ed…

  14. story
  15. comment
    Comment #40069884

    There are no extra costs other than the what we'd normally charge for Edge Function invocations (you get up to 500K in the free plan and 2M in the Pro plan)

  16. comment
    Comment #40068734

    If you are building using Supabase stack (Postgres as DB with pgVector), we just released a built-in embedding generation API yesterday. This works both locally (in CPUs) and you c…

  17. comment
    Comment #38633848

    We have a cluster of Edge Runtime instances in each region. We run multiple edge functions within an instance using v8 isolates (Deno's core runtime is a wrapper around v8 isolates…

  18. comment
    Comment #38618604

    I haven't tried Prisma myself, but hopefully this guide should work with Edge Functions with npm https://supabase.com/partners/integrations/prisma

  19. comment
    Comment #38618534

    Most builtin modules should work (except for things like `vm` which we cannot safely sandbox in edge runtime). Deno has a good guide on the compatibility of built-in modules https:…

  20. comment
    Comment #38617887

    Hey, thanks for sharing this on HN! I'm one of the Edge Functions developers at Supabase and co-author of the blog post. We are very excited about releasing npm support and looking…

  21. comment
    Comment #37220086

    @doganugurlu Looks like Deno team implemented a fix https://denostatus.com/cllm0jzq219036bjottk03k2ac Are you still experiencing the issue? We used to cache the modules locally, I …

  22. comment
    Comment #37082230

    > Oh, I had no idea that the functions routes were "wild card"! I don't think that's mentioned anywhere in the documentation, btw. Good point! will update the docs. > Sorry, I actu…

  23. comment
    Comment #37073327

    Hey @cjonas, I'm a developer on Supabase Edge Functions team. We do have plans to improve the current database trigger behavior. Will share more updates on this in the coming month…

  24. comment
    Comment #35562008

    Hey Andy, If you use Supabase CLI to serve functions locally, you can use the `--no-verify-jwt` flag, ie. `supabase functions serve --no-verify-jwt` will skip JWT checks locally. I…

  25. comment
    Comment #35536248

    Yep, that sounds interesting. Feel free to share with us if you write a formal proposal. Would love to explore the options to provide better worker-to-worker communication options.…