Viewing profile — lajhsdfkl
lajhsdfkl
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Apr 18, 2018, 7:33 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 50
- Public activity
- 114 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About lajhsdfkl
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #17214055
So I should be afraid of litigation?
-
comment
Comment #17213996
Then wtf is the point of GDPR if nobody will be sued for violating it?
-
comment
Comment #17213988
Discourse, disqus good job nit picking.
-
comment
Comment #17213942
How about you try answering this question I posed to you What is your point here? What is your point when you say that the EU is not litigious? Are you saying that I shouldn't expe…
-
comment
Comment #17213916
>Except this forum software does provide a tool that lets the user export their own data, as well as a tool that lets an admin strip all identifying data. Completely besides the po…
-
comment
Comment #17213910
> nobody will put you into jail for non-compliance ha > kidnap you or send a drone to you thank you for making it obvious you are arguing in bad faith. Hint: you are more likely to…
-
comment
Comment #17213896
This is at least the 5th instance I've seen of a website announcing their closure due to GDPR on Hacker News. Most websites probably wouldn't announce it and given that a post abou…
-
comment
Comment #17213889
Good try buddy
-
comment
Comment #17213879
> Yes, this is really little different from shutting down a whole forum because you received a single DMCA request. Completely unrelated. Not only are DMCA requests easier to handl…
-
comment
Comment #17213857
How is it an overreaction? If he doesn't want to waste his time because of EU snowflakes it is his prerogative to shut down his forum. Why do you believe you have a right to his se…
-
comment
Comment #17213854
Are you talking about Disqus specific features? Because that is really beside the point and the fact that you are bringing it up shows how clueless you GDPR zealots actually are.
-
comment
Comment #17203707
> If those equivalent resources are thousands (or millions) of government panels then we should be able to mathematically prove equivalency. There is a method of solving an NP comp…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #17203626
> if Lockheed martin were to start a Gmail, GDocs equivalent tomorrow, would you use their services knowing how closely they work with the military? Them working closely with the m…
-
comment
Comment #17203612
>We put our faith into them, in the hopes that they would honor their creed, that they would do no evil. Working for the US military is not doing evil.
-
comment
Comment #17203556
> then it implies that there is nothing special about markets How so? It implies simply that markets are not efficient. It does not imply that state control would be more efficient…
-
comment
Comment #17175057
Is the law only effective at protecting privacy in your mind if it kills Facebook's and Google's business model? Because I suspect that is what GDPR advocates truly want.
-
comment
Comment #17169716
I don't believe the 2 party system is the problem. Looking at political polarization in a country like France and it's just as bad.
- comment
-
comment
Comment #17163052
Thank you for giving my comment the least charitable reading possible. If that were the case why would I even bother leading with "you will either lead the way" If a better monetiz…
-
comment
Comment #17163047
This is correct.
-
comment
Comment #17163045
I don't care how you reword it, those "rights" are stupid.
-
comment
Comment #17160950
You mean the consent like not going on the website in the first place? And if all GDPR was just a bunch of consent forms it wouldn't even be a problem. GDPR is bad/onerous for the …
- comment
-
comment
Comment #17160927
>It should be possible to track ad campaigns and therefore see exactly the turnover ratios as long as the campaigns are broad enough that they don't target individual users. In the…