Viewing profile — l_camacho84
l_camacho84
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Nov 03, 2017, 9:42 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 34
- Public activity
- 22 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About l_camacho84
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #39615548
What are the alternatives to audible?
- comment
-
comment
Comment #20777145
Yes for me this is also the case. The WIP on the Kanban is very important. Is not a question of deadlines, is more a question of doing as little as possible at the same time.
-
comment
Comment #19930699
This is good news but sadly they don’t talk about transportation as normally they are not considered as a problem of the manufacturer. Maritime and airplane transportation emission…
-
comment
Comment #19624409
The costs are tiny because right now they not internalize pollution and social injustice. Yes, “local” is not an end on itself but the same is true for “global”. Right now the cost…
-
comment
Comment #19623476
I agree, we can apply robotics but always thinking in small scale farming, otherwise the gains in production will be lost in distribution. Sadly right now we are not paying for ext…
-
comment
Comment #19623264
To apply robotic berry pickers you normally need to produce in a large scale (many tons of berries). So you will need to distribute them. If you don’t apply the externalities of tr…
-
comment
Comment #19622960
Every time I read about farm mechanization I remember the Ralph Borsodi work on the book "The Distribution Age". Every efficiency you gain in production scale you tend to lose in d…
-
comment
Comment #19293586
We don't need to scale up if the developed countries agree to scale down consumption. Reducing commuting (working from home when possible), have taxes on airplane travel, tax goods…
-
comment
Comment #19293407
The best negative carbon tech that exists are trees and plants. It's not future tech it's already here!
-
comment
Comment #19253225
Every study that I know show that the dematerialization of economy will lead to a degrowth [1]. Moreover there are many non material things that we need but the majority used to be…
-
comment
Comment #19133249
We reading this kind of news we need to be concerned about survivourship bias. How many people did the same and lost everything? That people don't appear on BBC but they are far mo…
-
comment
Comment #18843917
How about just building less houses? Even China has overproduction of houses. All comes down to our economic paradigm where we need to produce infinitly otherwise we colapse
-
comment
Comment #18013767
Yes, and in the last 50 years carbon emissions have skyrocketed, while wages have stagnated. We are depleting the resources of the planet and polluting at an unbearable pace. We ha…
-
comment
Comment #18013335
By reducing imports from China, China will need to invest in their local market too and by doing that they will need to improve chinese worker conditions.
-
comment
Comment #17757767
We are starting to recognize that we don't need alf the things we buy. We are getting to the point that we don't own things, things own us. A sugestion, if you want to get rid of s…
-
comment
Comment #17708352
How many fossil fuels do we need to burn to accomplish all of this? The solution is to greatly reduce unnecessary consumption, decentralize agriculture, avoid private transportatio…
-
comment
Comment #17708022
We cannot forget that this agriculture is based on fertilizers that are a finite resource.
-
comment
Comment #17626914
Many people need this resources, including our children. That’s why we need to slow down our crave for things and enjoy what we have. We don’t need to change cars every 4 year, we …
-
comment
Comment #17626248
The question is not how many resources we have, the question is how hard they are to extract. The more resources we extract from earth the more difficult they become to extract, th…
-
comment
Comment #17625935
Australia is not utilising only 14% of their resources, they have only 14% of the known world resources. More than 50% is based on Congo were the work is performed in miserable con…
-
comment
Comment #15617870
We commute because of our growth dependency. This is just another example of simple solutions that cannot be truly implemented because it does not make money/jobs. We need to refle…