Viewing profile — kzhukov

Well, for some people loading an arbitrary binary code without possibility to check what's inside it is a critical security issue as well.

That were just the examples when Rust is not really suitable as a drop-in replacement for C/C++. Of course, if your platform is well-supported by Rust compiler and you don't have t…

> safety-critical applications Nope, Rust is also not suitable for these tasks since it doesn't have a certified toolchain (e.g. ISO26262 for automotive or DO-178 for aerospace). >…

Security is not a feature of the language or tool. Neither Rust nor C++ are fully secured even though the former could find more memory safety problems at compile time (but not all…

What I don't really like in cargo is its' overcentralized and author-centric approach. What if some of your dependencies relies on the crate, which author doesn't support anymore a…

There are fields such as automotive and aerospace where absence of Rust's standard is a showstopper for using Rust. Those areas require that all tools that are being used to build …