Viewing profile — kylereeve
kylereeve
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Oct 25, 2013, 4:03 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 36
- Public activity
- 29 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About kylereeve
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #46047512
no clout
-
comment
Comment #46047493
(keep on disk, don't commit)
-
comment
Comment #46047300
There's a very short list of people who can get away with "Classic Torvalds"
-
comment
Comment #45891325
Reminds me of Ace Rothstein wanting the exact same amount of blueberries in each muffin.
-
comment
Comment #45751011
That's how all application-specific specializations work though, take advantage of domain properties that make you need a less generic algorithm.
-
comment
Comment #45362522
I've never seen an IDE "mandated", I've seen officially supported development setups where you're on your own if you do anything different. Is that not the standard?
-
comment
Comment #45214115
When this bubble finally pops, someone is going to have to clean up all the nonsense AI code out there.
-
comment
Comment #44638027
they might be
-
comment
Comment #44586944
I'm gonna be pedantic, shouldn't it be "bottom-up" instead of "bottoms-up"?
-
comment
Comment #44387925
> #2 Software projects that somehow are 100% human developed will not be competitive with AI assisted or written projects. The only room for debate on that is an apocalypse level s…
-
comment
Comment #44171668
> If one just chooses a reasonable documentclass and if need be a few packages suited to the requirements of one's document, then it all "just works" with (mostly) sensible default…
-
comment
Comment #44171338
> Does an intern cost $20/month? Because that’s what Cursor.ai costs. This stuck out to me. How long will it continue to be so cheap? I would assume some of the low cost is subsidi…
-
comment
Comment #44052652
Assuming you're not being facetious, one of the best parts about PBT is it gets you a good percent of the value of formal proof with a lot less work. PBT at least lets you demonstr…
-
comment
Comment #43916840
Do you have CMake actually run `git clone`, or do you clone separately and point CMake at the `FIND_X` files?
-
comment
Comment #43907626
On the flip side, when you have a manager who's genuinely on your side and wants to help you produce value (seems rare, I've been lucky enough to land one or two), "pleasing your m…
-
comment
Comment #43906776
That's my experience with PMs (of all flavors of P; Product, Project, Program). A good one is invaluable and can really accelerate and unblock a project, especially one with a broa…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #42964738
When refactoring tests, some form of mutation coverage [0] would be really nice. Verify that the tests break when the underlying code changes. [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mut…
-
comment
Comment #40659106
If only I could find the perfect note taking system/app combo I could create my own Godfather! (I am 100% guilty of this type of thinking)
-
comment
Comment #34972136
They can never back up these claims, it's always just a feeling they have based on the right wing outrage bait they consume.
-
comment
Comment #32680814
Wasn't that Will Rogers?
-
comment
Comment #32584090
Do you work in Ada/SPARK professionally? Curious what industry if so.
-
comment
Comment #32141779
I'm not! [0] [0] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IsViQD-3roE
-
comment
Comment #24969108
I've been reading about that, can't seem to wrap my head around the difference between refinement and dependent types.
-
comment
Comment #15465781
I used to work in a company with a similar policy. Never got a satisfactory answer, I think there's just lots of FUD around any language feature that looks different than what peop…