Viewing profile — kofalt
kofalt
HN member- Joined
- Mon, Jan 13, 2014, 7:17 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 42
- Public activity
- 11 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About kofalt
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #8957809
After using Netflix for quite some time, I have no evidence to support any hypothesis other than that their overall selection is secretly horrible and that they wish to conceal thi…
-
comment
Comment #8929562
I don't know if it's reasonable to ask this, but it would be cool to have an option to swap them around? I guess I'll always be assuming it behaves like Firefox, so I'm tripping my…
-
comment
Comment #8929371
The feature of being able to share a URL from my browser to Offline is pretty sweet. I was irate that I had to type out URLs, until I thought to try that :) Bug report: hitting the…
-
comment
Comment #8839571
Yikes. > What I am saying is that it is no longer fundamentally the same thing I was originally hired to help build nor is it compatible with my vision for the future. I've heard e…
-
comment
Comment #8788948
According to Red Hat, the current best way to secure your Docker usage is to `127.0.0.1 index.docker.io` and use an alternate transport. The core "translate flags into running cont…
-
comment
Comment #8762527
Agreed. I try to explain sometimes that I'm merely tired of experiencing the same problem, over and over, for years. I would like to experience the next problem, please. If only fo…
-
comment
Comment #8660812
Shouldn't be terribly surprising: http://dayswithoutansslexploit.com HTTPS might be better than getting a website in cleartext, but you'd have to be a madman to claim that HTTPS is…
-
comment
Comment #7904596
Which circles back to the "Javascript is hostile to cryptography" point the article makes; I welcome any expert-audited JS libraries that can accomplish secure file encryption, for…
-
comment
Comment #7904043
> protection against the attack model of the passive eavesdropper My argument would be that trying to protect against passive attackers with JS adds nothing beyond what SSL already…
-
comment
Comment #7904012
You're right to point out the difference between targeted and general attacks, but you're also misrepresenting the problem. An attack on SSL can take quite awhile to research and i…
-
comment
Comment #7903967
> assume a somewhat determined attacker Most CVEs that come to mind assume a somewhat determined attacker. It takes a reasonably determined attacker to commit to rails without perm…