Viewing profile — knownothing
knownothing
HN member- Joined
- Thu, Jun 16, 2016, 3:08 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 170
- Public activity
- 81 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About knownothing
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #17241573
Exactly. > If there's anything I want Gitlab to copy from GitHub, it's the opinionated decision making of what to show and when to show it. Thing is, that will never happen. The pr…
-
comment
Comment #17241330
It's right in their blog post, if you read it https://about.gitlab.com/2018/06/03/movingtogitlab/
-
comment
Comment #17240872
GitHub is popular because it allows developers to connect the tools they want to use to their repository. Some people find having everything in one package convenient, but the trut…
-
comment
Comment #17240716
They are also paying people to Tweet. That's the only way for people to get a discount.
-
comment
Comment #17240703
None of the things you listed are focused on usability, which is what OP complained about. Liking some isolated features of a product doesn't mean it's easy to use/understand or we…
-
comment
Comment #17237441
Thing is it’s not even an exodus. It’s just a few thousand repos. And they aren’t even prepared to handle that. If there actually was a mass migration GitLab would completely fall …
-
comment
Comment #17237414
Yeah. This reeks of desperate and exaggerated marketing to me. Which is pretty much par for the course when it comes to anything GitLab says. As others have said, support for two p…
-
comment
Comment #17224968
This is pretty much par for course when it comes to GitLab marketing. Made up headlines that can't be supported with facts.
-
comment
Comment #17224070
I'd like to point out that GitLab is not independent. They are owned by investors, including Google Ventures. So anyone who thinks they're giving GitHub/MS the finger by migrating …
-
comment
Comment #17223942
Um, have you actually tried doing anything about this? https://help.github.com/articles/searching-in-forks/
-
comment
Comment #17210762
If the outcome is that they're adding more features to make the product better who cares? That's competition functioning as intended.
-
comment
Comment #16601701
> Every user account and organization on GitHub can have unlimited collaborators on any number of public repositories. From: https://help.github.com/articles/github-s-billing-plans…
-
comment
Comment #16601599
https://help.github.com/articles/backing-up-a-repository/
-
comment
Comment #16344717
I'd imagine all OAuth tokens associated with an account are rolled when it's transferred.
-
comment
Comment #16276572
Philosophy is important. The fact that you're even asking that question indicates a deep ignorance of the history of ideas and thought. It's also slightly absurd because empiricism…
-
comment
Comment #16275734
Interesting. If I was a sailor hundreds of years ago and witnessed something like that I might think it was a merman.
-
comment
Comment #16268290
Good luck finding a counterparty.
-
comment
Comment #16128767
Thanks, I'll take a look.
-
comment
Comment #16128558
You're definitely not alone. It makes sense on an intuitive level. Even when you "close" your eyes, you can't stop yourself from seeing. You're simply staring at the inside of your…
-
comment
Comment #16128431
It's a concerning trend. Another strange example: http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-la-weekly-20171129-sto...
-
comment
Comment #16127981
No problem. Atlassian actually acquired Bitbucket in 2010 and then released Stash (later rebranded as Bitbucket Server) in 2012.
-
comment
Comment #16127731
It'd be nice if you could link to the studies so we can check them out. I've seen a decent amount of criticism on this topic: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Implicit-association_tes…
-
comment
Comment #16125169
> bitbucket.org is just Atlassian's copy of BitBucket, which you can buy from them and hose yourself. This is incorrect. Bitbucket Cloud and Server are two completely separate code…
-
comment
Comment #16122017
Stop spamming this prediction in comments.
-
comment
Comment #16116318
Reasonable interpretation. Nice research. I wish the author had expressed what they meant more clearly. That phrase is poorly deployed.