Viewing profile — klickverbot
klickverbot
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Apr 27, 2012, 11:36 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 117
- Public activity
- 45 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About klickverbot
———
https://klickverbot.at
https://twitter.com/dnadlinger
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #33514342
> I think this is a pretty small point to get hung up on. The rest of her article is perfectly reasonable. The above isn't the only place that betrays her lack of understanding, th…
-
comment
Comment #30474809
Essentially, yes; all of quantum key distribution (QKD) is generating a secret key which can then e.g. be used as a one-time pad. The novelty here is that we can do it with much fe…
-
comment
Comment #30472650
> My naive security architect view is, I get the impression the people doing quantum engineering and those working as cryptographers have a very narrow overlap. You probably aren't…
-
comment
Comment #30472498
> QKD is no replacement for asymmetric cryptography since it requires exchanging a secret key before the communication can take place. Your general point about QKD "promises" vs. p…
-
comment
Comment #30472313
> Would it be accurate to say it is scaled back to the level achieved by classical (non-quantum) cryptography? Not quite. Classical cryptography of course requires the additional a…
-
comment
Comment #30471616
> I always read perfect secrecy as a term of art with some technical meaning. That's indeed the case, but I fear the subtle technical definition here is usually one of the first th…
-
comment
Comment #30470971
First author of one of the preprints mentioned in the article here (theory in Paris/Geneva/Zürich/Lausanne, experiment in Oxford) – happy to answer any questions! I obviously speak…
-
comment
Comment #30332977
There isn't anything special about functions; the original article does not describe this correctly. Rather, the big conceptual difference is the point at which the expression is e…
- story
-
comment
Comment #20465807
Physicist here too. What exactly do you disagree with? The parent comment is sound – thermal imaging cameras typically under-read on shiny metal surfaces. Their emissivity/absorpti…
-
comment
Comment #20098848
Reproducible in Firefox 67 on macOS as well. "DOWNLOAD" is only in one line for very wide windows, and for my default half-screen-wide window size (960 px), the main body title ren…
-
comment
Comment #17599983
There seems to be something very strange going on with the way you are building LDC. On the machine I am typing this message from [1], building DMD using DMD in optimized mode take…
-
comment
Comment #16372546
Nope, not photoshopped. It's a single exposure; the apparatus is illuminated using flashes. The latter made lighting the shot in a controlled fashion a bit easier than if I had use…
-
comment
Comment #16369901
Photographer here. The amount of attention this has received has caught me a bit off guard – this is really just a somewhat pretty picture of what is a standard technique in physic…
-
comment
Comment #15975095
There are some advantages to having access to a human-readable representation for the symbol name, for example because not every piece of binary tooling out there necessarily also …
-
comment
Comment #15975031
> it'd be the same amount of effort without as-fast-as-possible. While the first part is perhaps somewhat subjective, the second is just wrong. D allows you to get to the same bare…
-
comment
Comment #14608347
> D is arguably in the same bucket as Swift, and partly as Go. I don't think it's very useful to compare and contrast it against Rust. It is easy to claim how things "arguably" are…
-
comment
Comment #14168140
It's a lambda expression ("closure"/"anonymous function"/…) that doesn't capture any outside state (see e.g. http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/lambda ).
-
comment
Comment #14167298
> Rust and Go .. made better design choices that made them more popular [citation needed]
-
comment
Comment #14167279
D can interface with Objective-C just fine. The Apple-provided tooling will indeed be more convenient for the developer , but the result the end user sees will be a "high quality &…
-
comment
Comment #14064694
Do you depend on the C runtime as well?
-
comment
Comment #14063868
We LDC developers of course hope that you will continue to use LDC for all your non-x86 and high-performance needs. ;)
-
comment
Comment #14063828
> https://godbolt.org/g/IQ0O06 (And, of course, the entire main() disappears on -O1 and above: https://godbolt.org/g/FAWtak. )
-
comment
Comment #14063814
Just to clarify: LDC master is on 2.073.2 right now (the latest DMD release), with a 2.072.2-based release imminent, and work towards 2.074.0 (currently in beta) already underway. …
-
comment
Comment #14063777
LDC dev here. All the credit for this goes to Ilya Yaroshenko for the expertly crafted implementation and the LLVM developers for efficient low-level code generation (inlining, reg…