Viewing profile — kkapelon
kkapelon
HN member- Joined
- Thu, Feb 19, 2015, 11:44 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 1,143
- Public activity
- 340 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About kkapelon
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49209319
Strictly from personal opinion 1) Built-in sub agents assume you use a single AI agent. Some people use multiple, so they need separate terminals/processes by definition. Even if y…
-
comment
Comment #49208848
Not sure I understand your question. You literally asked, "WHAT is it that makes herdr et al so popular"? Why? Because it has more/better features. Or you mean something else? Spec…
-
comment
Comment #49207261
Simplest setup would be just plain ssh/mosh. Nothing more exotic. I have seen moshi.app but haven't tested it yet.
-
comment
Comment #49207243
https://herdr.dev/compare/
-
comment
Comment #49207238
https://herdr.dev/compare/
-
comment
Comment #49036533
I am not familiar with all the tools you listed so please correct me if i am wrong, but all these will catch stuff that LLMs can potentially catch as well (if configured correctly)…
-
comment
Comment #49032654
> Once you do all that the PR process is pointless manual PR reviews can catch things that llms currently miss. Examples are duplicated code, lack of unit tests or introducing secu…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #48828074
tmux and zellij are compared here https://herdr.dev/compare/
-
comment
Comment #48828072
There is a whole page just on this subject https://herdr.dev/compare/
-
comment
Comment #48828063
There is a whole page about this https://herdr.dev/compare/ For me the killer feature is the git worktree management. But in essence it is tmux on steroid (Specifically for agents)…
-
comment
Comment #48828042
You missed the most important one. Automatic git worktree management. So that different agents don't clash with each other.
-
comment
Comment #48743951
Because of lot of AI PRs come from first time contributors who just discovered the tools. Maybe their PR is amazing, maybe it is trash. You never know until you review it.
-
comment
Comment #48716501
What exactly does rac validate do? How is it deterministic? Is there an example somewhere?
-
comment
Comment #48599739
The goal posts keep moving. First iroh was marketed as "solves communication behind NAT". Then we went to application level NAT busting vs node level NAT busting. Then we went to d…
-
comment
Comment #48570148
They don't need to be https://tailscale.com/docs/features/tailscale-funnel For this simple scenario (just exposing your laptop to a public IP) there are already a gazillion alterna…
-
comment
Comment #48544645
They do if you use tailscale and friends
-
comment
Comment #48544607
but if I am shipping a video conferencing application (where I control both the client and the server) I don't need nat traversal anymore. My clients will have outgoing connections…
-
comment
Comment #48544493
but what exactly is the use case? I was responding to the nat traversal topic.. If I wanted to share something internal with a friend I would use ngrok or any of the million altern…
-
comment
Comment #48544030
Like https://tailscale.com/docs/features/tsnet ?
-
comment
Comment #48543998
Congrats on shipping You need urgently a "versus" page that talks about tailscale/netbird/netmaker/zerotier/twingate/openziti Looking at the use cases, right now I don't see anythi…
-
comment
Comment #48543952
you can embed tailscale on the application level https://tailscale.com/docs/features/tsnet
-
comment
Comment #48543846
Already possible with taiscale, netmaker, zerotier etc. https://tailscale.com/blog/how-nat-traversal-works
-
comment
Comment #48543836
isn't this exactly what tailscale (and also zerotier, netmaker) do? https://tailscale.com/blog/how-nat-traversal-works
-
comment
Comment #47836767
Thanks! I fixed it.